PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBSAX vs. INUTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LBSAX vs. INUTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) and Columbia Dividend Opportunity Fund (INUTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBSAX achieves a 12.04% return, which is significantly lower than INUTX's 16.43% return. Over the past 10 years, LBSAX has outperformed INUTX with an annualized return of 12.25%, while INUTX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.47% annualized return.


LBSAX

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.70%
6M
7.67%
YTD
12.04%
1Y
21.71%
3Y*
15.05%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
12.25%
ALL TIME*
10.37%

INUTX

1D
0.04%
1M
1.61%
6M
10.01%
YTD
16.43%
1Y
28.24%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
10.47%
ALL TIME*
9.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LBSAX vs. INUTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LBSAX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A
12.04%15.58%14.73%10.26%-5.19%25.97%7.48%27.84%-4.62%19.96%
INUTX
Columbia Dividend Opportunity Fund
16.43%15.64%14.41%4.88%-1.68%26.09%0.76%23.31%-5.32%12.93%

Correlation

The correlation between LBSAX and INUTX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2002

0.94

The correlation between LBSAX and INUTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LBSAX vs. INUTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LBSAX
LBSAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
LBSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
LBSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

INUTX
INUTX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
INUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
INUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
INUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
INUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LBSAX vs. INUTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) and Columbia Dividend Opportunity Fund (INUTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LBSAXINUTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.47

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

3.47

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.88

13.03

+0.85

LBSAX vs. INUTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBSAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the INUTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBSAX and INUTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LBSAX vs. INUTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBSAX drawdown since its inception was -47.89%, smaller than the maximum INUTX drawdown of -55.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBSAX and INUTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LBSAXINUTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.89%

-55.57%

+7.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.52%

-7.60%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

-14.17%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.16%

-16.15%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.82%

-34.77%

+1.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-1.20%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-7.64%

+2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

2.04%

-0.58%

Volatility

LBSAX vs. INUTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) is 2.41%, while Columbia Dividend Opportunity Fund (INUTX) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that LBSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INUTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LBSAXINUTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

2.75%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.76%

7.70%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.23%

10.46%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.23%

13.57%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.67%

15.83%

-0.16%

LBSAX vs. INUTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBSAX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than INUTX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

LBSAX vs. INUTX - Dividend Comparison

LBSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than INUTX's 6.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INUTX
Columbia Dividend Opportunity Fund
6.89%8.05%7.27%3.76%7.82%12.77%4.22%12.47%12.99%10.68%3.84%5.80%
LBSAX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A
4.58%5.11%5.78%4.72%3.62%2.65%1.52%2.68%7.36%3.83%3.60%8.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, LBSAX and INUTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

INUTX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to LBSAX (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBSAX dropped -47.89% vs INUTX's -55.57%.

INUTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBSAX and INUTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer