PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBSAX vs. PEYAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LBSAX vs. PEYAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) and Putnam Large Cap Value Fund (PEYAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBSAX achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly lower than PEYAX's 10.90% return. Over the past 10 years, LBSAX has underperformed PEYAX with an annualized return of 12.31%, while PEYAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.35% annualized return.


LBSAX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.36%
YTD
8.70%
6M
8.22%
1Y
21.12%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.31%

PEYAX

1D
0.16%
1M
2.60%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.45%
1Y
27.70%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*
13.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBSAX vs. PEYAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LBSAX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A
8.70%15.58%14.73%10.26%-5.19%25.97%7.48%27.84%-4.62%19.96%
PEYAX
Putnam Large Cap Value Fund
10.90%20.09%18.99%15.09%-8.37%26.84%5.87%29.94%-8.63%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between LBSAX and PEYAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2002

0.95

The correlation between LBSAX and PEYAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LBSAX vs. PEYAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBSAX
LBSAX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LBSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
LBSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PEYAX
PEYAX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PEYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
PEYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBSAX vs. PEYAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) and Putnam Large Cap Value Fund (PEYAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LBSAXPEYAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.46

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

3.85

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.45

14.92

-0.47

LBSAX vs. PEYAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBSAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the PEYAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBSAX and PEYAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LBSAX vs. PEYAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBSAX drawdown since its inception was -47.89%, smaller than the maximum PEYAX drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBSAX and PEYAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LBSAXPEYAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.89%

-56.92%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.52%

-7.23%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

-15.12%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.16%

-15.31%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.82%

-36.06%

+3.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-0.84%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-14.04%

+8.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

1.86%

-0.39%

Volatility

LBSAX vs. PEYAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) is 2.65%, while Putnam Large Cap Value Fund (PEYAX) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that LBSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEYAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LBSAXPEYAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

3.96%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.90%

8.48%

-1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.19%

10.91%

-1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.26%

14.73%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.70%

17.08%

-1.38%

LBSAX vs. PEYAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBSAX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PEYAX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

LBSAX vs. PEYAX - Dividend Comparison

LBSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, which matches PEYAX's 4.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LBSAX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A
4.72%5.11%5.78%4.72%3.62%2.65%1.52%2.68%7.36%3.83%3.60%8.01%
PEYAX
Putnam Large Cap Value Fund
4.76%5.36%6.80%4.93%1.21%7.09%5.97%3.79%5.67%3.31%2.27%5.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, LBSAX and PEYAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PEYAX has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to LBSAX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBSAX dropped -47.89% vs PEYAX's -56.92%.

PEYAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBSAX and PEYAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer