LBAY vs. RPAR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LBAY (Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF) and RPAR (RPAR Risk Parity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LBAY is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Toroso Investments, while RPAR is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Toroso Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, LBAY returned 3.91%/yr vs 1.79%/yr for RPAR. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LBAY charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for RPAR.

Performance

LBAY vs. RPAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBAY achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly lower than RPAR's 7.67% return.

LBAY

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -0.47%
• YTD: 6.83%
• 6M: 9.25%
• 1Y: 9.13%
• 3Y*: 3.68%
• 5Y*: 3.91%
• 10Y*: —

RPAR

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: 7.67%
• 6M: 7.24%
• 1Y: 19.60%
• 3Y*: 9.28%
• 5Y*: 1.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBAY vs. RPAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LBAY Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF	6.83%	4.08%	-3.49%	-8.54%	22.41%	22.27%	4.58%
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF	7.67%	17.91%	0.06%	6.03%	-22.82%	7.56%	4.04%

Correlation

The correlation between LBAY and RPAR is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020	0.33

The correlation between LBAY and RPAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LBAY vs. RPAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LBAY	RPAR
Basic Materials	20.8%	6.4%
Consumer Defensive	16.3%	0.3%
Financial Services	15.3%	35.9%
Industrials	12.5%	2.1%
Energy	11.4%	5.9%
Utilities	11.2%	0.2%
Healthcare	5.5%	5.1%
Consumer Cyclical	4.3%	0.1%
Technology	2.8%	0.1%
Real Estate	2.8%	-0.0%
Communication Services	-	4.9%

Return for Risk

LBAY vs. RPAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBAY

LBAY Risk / Return Rank: 19
LBAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
LBAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
LBAY Omega Ratio Rank: 19
LBAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
LBAY Martin Ratio Rank: 18

RPAR

RPAR Risk / Return Rank: 55
RPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
RPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
RPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 58
RPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
RPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBAY vs. RPAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LBAY	RPAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	1.95	-1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	2.70	-1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.35	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	2.43	-1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.94	8.02	-6.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LBAY vs. RPAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the RPAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBAY and RPAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LBAY	RPAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60	1.95	-1.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.15	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.36	+0.23

Drawdowns

LBAY vs. RPAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBAY drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum RPAR drawdown of -30.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBAY and RPAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LBAY	RPAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.99%	-30.16%	+14.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.91%	-8.10%	-3.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.57%	-13.20%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.99%	-30.16%	+14.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.34%	-2.51%	-7.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.80%	-11.61%	+4.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.71%	2.45%	+2.26%

Volatility

LBAY vs. RPAR - Volatility Comparison

Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) at 3.52%. This indicates that LBAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LBAY	RPAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.80%	3.52%	+0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.82%	8.37%	+4.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.26%	10.20%	+5.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.59%	12.39%	+1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.73%	12.68%	+1.05%

LBAY vs. RPAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBAY has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than RPAR's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

LBAY vs. RPAR - Dividend Comparison

LBAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than RPAR's 2.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LBAY Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF	3.79%	3.80%	3.77%	3.47%	2.74%	2.96%	0.29%	0.00%
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF	2.07%	2.55%	2.51%	3.16%	4.01%	2.02%	0.76%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LBAY and RPAR in my portfolio?

LBAY and RPAR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LBAY or RPAR?

LBAY has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to RPAR (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBAY dropped -15.99% vs RPAR's -30.16%.

Which ETF is better, LBAY or RPAR?

On 5-year performance, LBAY leads with 3.91% vs 1.79% for RPAR. On fees, RPAR is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, RPAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LBAY or RPAR?

Over the 5-year period, LBAY has performed better with a 3.91% return vs 1.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LBAY or RPAR?

RPAR is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for LBAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LBAY or RPAR?

LBAY has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 2.07% for RPAR.

What is the main difference between LBAY and RPAR?

LBAY is categorized as Long-Short, while RPAR is Hedge Fund. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for LBAY and 0.51% for RPAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.