LBAY vs. RPAR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR).

LBAY and RPAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LBAY is an actively managed fund by Toroso Investments. It was launched on Nov 16, 2020. RPAR is an actively managed fund by Toroso Investments. It was launched on Dec 13, 2019.

Performance

LBAY vs. RPAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LBAY vs. RPAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LBAY Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF	15.90%	4.08%	-3.49%	-8.54%	22.41%	22.27%	4.58%
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF	3.85%	17.91%	0.06%	6.03%	-22.82%	7.56%	4.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBAY achieves a 15.90% return, which is significantly higher than RPAR's 3.85% return.

LBAY

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -2.73%
• YTD: 15.90%
• 6M: 14.05%
• 1Y: 12.14%
• 3Y*: 4.38%
• 5Y*: 7.44%
• 10Y*: —

RPAR

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: -5.97%
• YTD: 3.85%
• 6M: 6.09%
• 1Y: 15.70%
• 3Y*: 7.21%
• 5Y*: 2.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBAY vs. RPAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBAY has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than RPAR's 0.51% expense ratio.

LBAY

Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF

RPAR

RPAR Risk Parity ETF

Return for Risk

LBAY vs. RPAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBAY

LBAY Risk / Return Rank: 43
LBAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
LBAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
LBAY Omega Ratio Rank: 39
LBAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
LBAY Martin Ratio Rank: 36

RPAR

RPAR Risk / Return Rank: 75
RPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
RPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
RPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 71
RPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
RPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBAY vs. RPAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LBAY	RPAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	1.34	-0.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	1.86	-0.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.25	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	2.05	-0.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.16	7.30	-4.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LBAY vs. RPAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the RPAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBAY and RPAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LBAY	RPAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75	1.34	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.18	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.32	+0.41

Correlation

The correlation between LBAY and RPAR is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LBAY vs. RPAR - Dividend Comparison

LBAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than RPAR's 2.15% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LBAY Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF	3.40%	3.80%	3.77%	3.47%	2.74%	2.96%	0.29%	0.00%
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF	2.15%	2.55%	2.51%	3.16%	4.01%	2.02%	0.76%	0.23%

Drawdowns

LBAY vs. RPAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBAY drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum RPAR drawdown of -30.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBAY and RPAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LBAY	RPAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.99%	-30.16%	+14.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.71%	-8.10%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.99%	-30.16%	+14.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.73%	-5.97%	+3.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.77%	-11.83%	+5.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.18%	2.27%	+1.91%

Volatility

LBAY vs. RPAR - Volatility Comparison

Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) at 4.81%. This indicates that LBAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LBAY	RPAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.55%	4.81%	+0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.16%	7.74%	+4.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.19%	11.75%	+4.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.49%	12.36%	+1.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.66%	12.74%	+0.92%