PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBAY vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LBAY vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LBAY vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LBAY
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF
15.70%4.08%-3.49%-8.54%22.41%22.27%4.58%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%4.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBAY achieves a 15.70% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.95% return.


LBAY

1D
-0.17%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
15.70%
6M
13.71%
1Y
12.46%
3Y*
4.32%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LBAY vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBAY
LBAY Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LBAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBAY Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
LBAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBAY Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBAY vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LBAY^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.77

0.92

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.23

1.41

-0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.21

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.41

-0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.98

6.61

-3.64

LBAY vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBAY and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LBAY^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

0.92

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.61

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.46

+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between LBAY and ^GSPC is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

LBAY vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBAY drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBAY and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LBAY^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.99%

-56.78%

+40.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-12.14%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.99%

-25.43%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-5.78%

+2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-10.75%

+3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

2.60%

+1.41%

Volatility

LBAY vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) have volatilities of 5.17% and 5.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LBAY^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

5.37%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.15%

9.55%

+2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

18.33%

-2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.48%

16.90%

-3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.66%

18.05%

-4.39%