PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBAY vs. KMLM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LBAY vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LBAY vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LBAY
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF
15.90%4.08%-3.49%-8.54%22.41%22.27%3.13%
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
8.67%-2.98%-1.69%-5.66%30.61%7.04%5.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBAY achieves a 15.90% return, which is significantly higher than KMLM's 8.67% return.


LBAY

1D
-0.68%
1M
-2.73%
YTD
15.90%
6M
14.05%
1Y
12.14%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*

KMLM

1D
-0.28%
1M
4.21%
YTD
8.67%
6M
10.01%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
0.44%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LBAY vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBAY has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LBAY vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBAY
LBAY Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LBAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBAY Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
LBAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBAY Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

KMLM
KMLM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
KMLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMLM Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
KMLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMLM Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBAY vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LBAYKMLMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

0.88

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

1.27

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.16

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

1.13

+0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.16

3.31

-0.15

LBAY vs. KMLM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the KMLM Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBAY and KMLM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LBAYKMLMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

0.88

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.39

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.49

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between LBAY and KMLM is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LBAY vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison

LBAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than KMLM's 4.62% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
LBAY
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF
3.40%3.80%3.77%3.47%2.74%2.96%0.29%
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
4.62%5.02%0.82%0.00%13.22%6.94%0.00%

Drawdowns

LBAY vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBAY drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum KMLM drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBAY and KMLM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LBAYKMLMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.99%

-27.47%

+11.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-6.73%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.99%

-27.47%

+11.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-15.27%

+12.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-12.73%

+5.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

2.41%

+1.77%

Volatility

LBAY vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison

Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) at 4.05%. This indicates that LBAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LBAYKMLMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

4.05%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.16%

7.22%

+4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

9.84%

+6.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.49%

14.57%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.66%

14.67%

-1.01%