LAZ vs. K

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

LAZ (Lazard Ltd) and K (Kellogg Company) are both stocks. LAZ operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while K operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LAZ vs. K - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Ltd (LAZ) and Kellogg Company (K). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LAZ

• 1D: -4.51%
• 1M: -2.56%
• YTD: -2.67%
• 6M: -13.67%
• 1Y: 7.45%
• 3Y*: 20.64%
• 5Y*: 4.45%
• 10Y*: 8.71%

K

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAZ vs. K - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LAZ Lazard Ltd	-2.67%	-1.64%	54.83%	6.92%	-16.21%	7.41%	12.08%	15.22%	-25.38%	36.20%
K Kellogg Company	0.00%	5.99%	49.75%	-7.44%	14.35%	7.44%	-6.78%	26.08%	-13.32%	-4.93%

Correlation

The correlation between LAZ and K is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2005	0.22

The correlation between LAZ and K shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LAZ : $4.95B K : $29.20B
EPS LAZ : $2.61 K : $3.65
PE Ratio LAZ : 17.77 K : 22.87
PS Ratio LAZ : 1.50 K : 2.30
PB Ratio LAZ : 5.62 K : 6.95
Total Revenue (TTM) LAZ : $3.28B K : $12.67B
Gross Profit (TTM) LAZ : $1.54B K : $4.41B
EBITDA (TTM) LAZ : $477.61M K : $2.25B

Return for Risk

LAZ vs. K — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAZ

LAZ Risk / Return Rank: 49
LAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
LAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
LAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 45
LAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
LAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAZ vs. K - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Ltd (LAZ) and Kellogg Company (K). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LAZ	K	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.35	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.82	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LAZ	K	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	LAZ	K	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.52%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.47%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.38%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LAZ	K	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.34%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.19%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.21%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.88%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.06%	—	—

Dividends

LAZ vs. K - Dividend Comparison

LAZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than K's 1.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
K Kellogg Company	1.39%	2.76%	2.79%	10.56%	3.28%	3.59%	3.66%	3.27%	3.86%	3.12%	2.77%	2.74%
LAZ Lazard Ltd	4.31%	4.12%	3.89%	5.75%	5.60%	4.31%	4.44%	5.88%	8.21%	5.35%	6.55%	5.22%

Financials

LAZ vs. K - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lazard Ltd and Kellogg Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LAZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lazard Ltd reported a gross profit of 779.40M and revenue of 779.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

K - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 3.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

LAZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lazard Ltd reported an operating income of 112.39M and revenue of 779.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

K - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported an operating income of 452.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

LAZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lazard Ltd reported a net income of 100.92M and revenue of 779.40M, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.

K - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LAZ and K in my portfolio?

LAZ and K have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.