LAZ vs. GILD
LAZ (Lazard Ltd) and GILD (Gilead Sciences, Inc.) are both stocks. LAZ operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while GILD operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, LAZ returned 8.21%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for GILD. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LAZ vs. GILD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAZ achieves a -8.51% return, which is significantly lower than GILD's 7.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LAZ having a 8.21% annualized return and GILD not far behind at 7.93%.
LAZ
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- -17.49%
- YTD
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- -15.69%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- 4.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.57%
GILD
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- 21.39%
- 3Y*
- 21.28%
- 5Y*
- 17.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $776.83M | $985.51M | $985.01M | |
LAZ Lazard Ltd | $75.66M | $81.64M | $91.44M |
LAZ vs. GILD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAZ Lazard Ltd | -8.51% | -1.64% | 54.83% | 6.92% | -16.21% | 7.41% | 12.08% | 15.22% | -25.38% | 36.20% |
GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 7.50% | 36.59% | 18.68% | -1.99% | 23.63% | 29.95% | -6.70% | 7.88% | -9.92% | 2.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAZ and GILD is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2005 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LAZ and GILD has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
LAZ:
$4.29B
GILD:
$161.83B
LAZ:
$2.60
GILD:
$7.35
LAZ:
16.78
GILD:
17.73
LAZ:
1.42
GILD:
5.50
LAZ:
5.28
GILD:
6.95
LAZ:
$3.28B
GILD:
$29.74B
LAZ:
$1.54B
GILD:
$18.74B
LAZ:
$477.61M
GILD:
$12.88B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAZ vs. GILD — Risk / Return Rank
LAZ
GILD
LAZ vs. GILD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Ltd (LAZ) and Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LAZ | GILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.15 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 1.00 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 2.34 | -3.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LAZ vs. GILD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAZ drawdown since its inception was -62.72%, smaller than the maximum GILD drawdown of -70.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAZ and GILD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAZ | GILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.72% | -70.83% | +8.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.39% | -21.59% | -9.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.24% | -26.59% | -17.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.24% | -26.59% | -17.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.51% | -30.47% | -29.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.41% | -15.31% | -8.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.50% | -22.14% | -1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.88% | 9.16% | +6.72% |
Volatility
LAZ vs. GILD - Volatility Comparison
Lazard Ltd (LAZ) has a higher volatility of 13.02% compared to Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) at 10.00%. This indicates that LAZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GILD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAZ | GILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.02% | 10.00% | +3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.41% | 19.91% | +14.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.46% | 27.30% | +13.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.65% | 24.52% | +13.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.96% | 25.60% | +10.36% |
Dividends
LAZ vs. GILD - Dividend Comparison
LAZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than GILD's 2.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 2.47% | 2.57% | 3.33% | 3.70% | 3.40% | 3.91% | 4.67% | 3.88% | 3.65% | 2.90% | 2.57% | 1.27% |
LAZ Lazard Ltd | 4.59% | 4.12% | 3.89% | 5.75% | 5.60% | 4.31% | 4.44% | 5.88% | 8.21% | 5.35% | 6.55% | 5.22% |
Financials
LAZ vs. GILD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lazard Ltd and Gilead Sciences, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LAZ vs. GILD - Profitability Comparison
LAZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lazard Ltd reported a gross profit of 779.40M and revenue of 779.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
GILD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.20M and revenue of 6.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.1%.
LAZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lazard Ltd reported an operating income of 112.39M and revenue of 779.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
GILD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.59B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.
LAZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lazard Ltd reported a net income of 100.92M and revenue of 779.40M, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.
GILD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a net income of 2.02B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in a net margin of 29.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LAZ and GILD have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LAZ has higher volatility (13.02%) compared to GILD (10.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAZ dropped -62.72% vs GILD's -70.83%.
GILD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAZ and GILD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer