PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GILD vs. JNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GILD vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILD achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 24.55% return. Over the past 10 years, GILD has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 9.13%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.43% annualized return.


GILD

1D
3.13%
1M
3.03%
6M
-4.44%
YTD
11.55%
1Y
21.19%
3Y*
23.80%
5Y*
18.56%
10Y*
9.13%
ALL TIME*
18.64%

JNJ

1D
0.20%
1M
-3.08%
6M
10.58%
YTD
24.55%
1Y
52.77%
3Y*
18.07%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
10.43%
ALL TIME*
12.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$883.63M$898.88M$999.96M
$2.08B$2.07B$2.01B

GILD vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
11.55%36.59%18.68%-1.99%23.63%29.95%-6.70%7.88%-9.92%2.96%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
24.55%47.48%-4.81%-8.58%5.97%11.44%10.82%16.22%-5.13%24.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GILD and JNJ is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1992

0.28

The correlation between GILD and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GILD:

$167.92B

JNJ:

$614.36B

EPS

GILD:

$4.18

JNJ:

$8.63

PE Ratio

GILD:

32.32

JNJ:

29.55

PEG Ratio

GILD:

0.08

JNJ:

0.98

PS Ratio

GILD:

5.56

JNJ:

6.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

GILD:

$30.46B

JNJ:

$97.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GILD:

$12.58B

JNJ:

$68.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

GILD:

-$53.00M

JNJ:

$31.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GILD vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GILD
GILD Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILD Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
GILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILD Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GILD vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GILDJNJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.50

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

4.84

-3.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.23

13.39

-11.16

GILD vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GILD Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILD and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GILD vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILD drawdown since its inception was -70.83%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILD and JNJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GILDJNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.83%

-50.67%

-20.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.59%

-10.96%

-10.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.59%

-15.72%

-10.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.59%

-18.41%

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.47%

-27.37%

-3.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.12%

-4.61%

-7.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.13%

-11.88%

-10.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.55%

3.95%

+5.60%

Volatility

GILD vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) has a higher volatility of 9.59% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 7.58%. This indicates that GILD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GILDJNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.59%

7.58%

+2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.45%

14.99%

+4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.14%

18.33%

+8.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.57%

17.46%

+7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.48%

18.76%

+6.72%

Dividends

GILD vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

GILD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than JNJ's 2.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
2.38%2.57%3.33%3.70%3.40%3.91%4.67%3.88%3.65%2.90%2.57%1.27%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.06%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%

Financials

GILD vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GILD and JNJ have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GILD has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to JNJ (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILD dropped -70.83% vs JNJ's -50.67%.

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GILD and JNJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer