LASR vs. MTZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR) and MasTec, Inc. (MTZ).

Performance

LASR vs. MTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR) and MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LASR vs. MTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LASR nLIGHT, Inc.	52.01%	257.58%	-22.30%	33.14%	-57.66%	-26.65%	61.00%	14.06%	-34.03%
MTZ MasTec, Inc.	48.01%	59.67%	79.79%	-11.26%	-7.53%	35.35%	6.27%	58.19%	-10.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LASR : $2.90B MTZ : $25.33B
EPS LASR : -$0.47 MTZ : $5.06
PS Ratio LASR : 10.92 MTZ : 1.77
PB Ratio LASR : 12.81 MTZ : 7.60
Total Revenue (TTM) LASR : $261.33M MTZ : $14.30B
Gross Profit (TTM) LASR : $77.96M MTZ : $1.79B
EBITDA (TTM) LASR : -$28.35M MTZ : $1.10B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LASR achieves a 52.01% return, which is significantly higher than MTZ's 48.01% return.

LASR

• 1D: 5.59%
• 1M: 1.48%
• YTD: 52.01%
• 6M: 92.44%
• 1Y: 633.85%
• 3Y*: 77.59%
• 5Y*: 11.42%
• 10Y*: —

MTZ

• 1D: 5.21%
• 1M: 7.96%
• YTD: 48.01%
• 6M: 51.19%
• 1Y: 175.67%
• 3Y*: 50.47%
• 5Y*: 27.69%
• 10Y*: 31.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LASR vs. MTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LASR

LASR Risk / Return Rank: 99
LASR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
LASR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
LASR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
LASR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
LASR Martin Ratio Rank: 100

MTZ

MTZ Risk / Return Rank: 98
MTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LASR vs. MTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR) and MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LASR	MTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	7.60	4.32	+3.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.18	4.22	+0.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	1.61	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	24.95	12.68	+12.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	97.67	37.92	+59.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LASR vs. MTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LASR Sharpe Ratio is 7.60, which is higher than the MTZ Sharpe Ratio of 4.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LASR and MTZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LASR	MTZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.60	4.32	+3.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18	0.66	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.19	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between LASR and MTZ is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LASR vs. MTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither LASR nor MTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LASR vs. MTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LASR drawdown since its inception was -85.66%, smaller than the maximum MTZ drawdown of -97.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LASR and MTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	LASR	MTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.66%	-97.72%	+12.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.74%	-14.13%	-10.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-82.47%	-61.01%	-21.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-67.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.53%	-0.56%	-19.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.77%	-52.14%	-1.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.32%	4.72%	+1.60%

Volatility

LASR vs. MTZ - Volatility Comparison

nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR) has a higher volatility of 31.42% compared to MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) at 14.12%. This indicates that LASR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LASR	MTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.42%	14.12%	+17.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.76%	29.41%	+28.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	84.25%	40.95%	+43.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.83%	42.17%	+21.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.87%	43.63%	+22.24%

Financials

LASR vs. MTZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between nLIGHT, Inc. and MasTec, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LASR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, nLIGHT, Inc. reported a gross profit of 24.95M and revenue of 81.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.7%.

MTZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported a gross profit of 508.34M and revenue of 3.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.

LASR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, nLIGHT, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.41M and revenue of 81.19M, resulting in an operating margin of -6.7%.

MTZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported an operating income of 319.21M and revenue of 3.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

LASR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, nLIGHT, Inc. reported a net income of -4.91M and revenue of 81.19M, resulting in a net margin of -6.1%.

MTZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported a net income of 142.71M and revenue of 3.94B, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.