LASR vs. ASML
LASR (nLIGHT, Inc.) and ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — LASR in Semiconductors, ASML in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials. Over the past 5 years, LASR returned 14.68%/yr vs 17.48%/yr for ASML. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LASR vs. ASML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LASR achieves a 83.42% return, which is significantly higher than ASML's 53.00% return.
LASR
- 1D
- 4.70%
- 1M
- 8.77%
- 6M
- 50.84%
- YTD
- 83.42%
- 1Y
- 242.12%
- 3Y*
- 70.14%
- 5Y*
- 14.68%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.18%
ASML
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -7.81%
- 6M
- 15.03%
- YTD
- 53.00%
- 1Y
- 137.71%
- 3Y*
- 33.26%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- 32.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 26.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.24B | $3.55B | $3.45B | |
LASR nLIGHT, Inc. | $58.41M | $74.60M | $88.55M |
LASR vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LASR nLIGHT, Inc. | 83.42% | 257.58% | -22.30% | 33.14% | -57.66% | -26.65% | 61.00% | 14.06% | -22.70% |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 53.00% | 56.51% | -7.70% | 39.91% | -30.49% | 64.13% | 66.06% | 93.56% | -18.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between LASR and ASML is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2018 | 0.48 |
The correlation between LASR and ASML has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
LASR:
$3.88B
ASML:
$627.85B
LASR:
-$0.28
ASML:
€27.54
LASR:
12.70
ASML:
15.47
LASR:
9.61
ASML:
24.94
LASR:
$289.84M
ASML:
€35.33B
LASR:
$90.68M
ASML:
€18.63B
LASR:
-$3.27M
ASML:
€13.77B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LASR vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank
LASR
ASML
LASR vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LASR | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.41 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.41 | 6.23 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.65 | 21.34 | -0.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LASR vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LASR drawdown since its inception was -85.66%, roughly equal to the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LASR and ASML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LASR | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.66% | -90.00% | +4.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.92% | -21.95% | -8.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.13% | -45.38% | -10.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.47% | -56.84% | -23.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.01% | -18.01% | -1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.16% | -28.04% | -24.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.07% | 6.40% | +4.67% |
Volatility
LASR vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison
nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR) has a higher volatility of 35.65% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 14.49%. This indicates that LASR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LASR | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.65% | 14.49% | +21.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.42% | 37.32% | +32.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.32% | 46.08% | +40.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.29% | 43.25% | +24.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.52% | 39.13% | +28.39% |
Dividends
LASR vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison
LASR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.56% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 0.86% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 1.40% | 0.94% | 0.64% | 0.92% | 0.73% |
LASR nLIGHT, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LASR vs. ASML - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between nLIGHT, Inc. and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LASR vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison
LASR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, nLIGHT, Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.51M and revenue of 80.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.1%.
ASML - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 5.04B and revenue of 9.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.0%.
LASR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, nLIGHT, Inc. reported an operating income of -719.00K and revenue of 80.18M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.9%.
ASML - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.46B and revenue of 9.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.
LASR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, nLIGHT, Inc. reported a net income of 645.00K and revenue of 80.18M, resulting in a net margin of 0.8%.
ASML - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.92B and revenue of 9.33B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LASR and ASML have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LASR has higher volatility (35.65%) compared to ASML (14.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LASR dropped -85.66% vs ASML's -90.00%.
ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LASR and ASML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer