LASR vs. ASML

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML).

Performance

LASR vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LASR vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LASR nLIGHT, Inc.	55.43%	257.58%	-22.30%	33.14%	-57.66%	-26.65%	61.00%	14.06%	-34.03%
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	27.27%	56.51%	-7.70%	39.91%	-30.49%	64.13%	66.06%	93.56%	-19.87%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LASR : $2.97B ASML : $528.81B
EPS LASR : -$0.47 ASML : $23.77
PS Ratio LASR : 11.17 ASML : 16.83
PB Ratio LASR : 13.09 ASML : 26.97
Total Revenue (TTM) LASR : $261.33M ASML : $31.38B
Gross Profit (TTM) LASR : $77.96M ASML : $16.58B
EBITDA (TTM) LASR : -$28.35M ASML : $11.94B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LASR achieves a 55.43% return, which is significantly higher than ASML's 27.27% return.

LASR

• 1D: 2.24%
• 1M: -13.87%
• YTD: 55.43%
• 6M: 91.84%
• 1Y: 644.57%
• 3Y*: 78.91%
• 5Y*: 11.92%
• 10Y*: —

ASML

• 1D: 2.95%
• 1M: -4.48%
• YTD: 27.27%
• 6M: 35.95%
• 1Y: 106.05%
• 3Y*: 27.24%
• 5Y*: 17.57%
• 10Y*: 31.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LASR vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LASR

LASR Risk / Return Rank: 99
LASR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
LASR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
LASR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
LASR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
LASR Martin Ratio Rank: 100

ASML

ASML Risk / Return Rank: 93
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 90
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LASR vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LASR	ASML	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	7.73	2.55	+5.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.21	3.12	+2.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	1.40	+0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	26.29	6.02	+20.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	101.16	16.79	+84.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LASR vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LASR Sharpe Ratio is 7.73, which is higher than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LASR and ASML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LASR	ASML	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.73	2.55	+5.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	0.43	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.54	-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between LASR and ASML is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LASR vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

LASR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LASR nLIGHT, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	0.69%	0.97%	0.97%	0.86%	1.27%	0.50%	0.50%	1.40%	0.94%	0.64%	0.92%	0.73%

Drawdowns

LASR vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LASR drawdown since its inception was -85.66%, roughly equal to the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LASR and ASML.

Drawdown Indicators

	LASR	ASML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.66%	-90.00%	+4.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.74%	-17.85%	-6.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-82.47%	-56.84%	-25.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-56.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.75%	-10.92%	-7.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.75%	-28.28%	-25.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.43%	6.40%	+0.03%

Volatility

LASR vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR) has a higher volatility of 30.84% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 14.55%. This indicates that LASR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LASR	ASML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	30.84%	14.55%	+16.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.77%	29.45%	+28.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	84.19%	41.84%	+42.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.83%	41.54%	+22.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.86%	38.06%	+27.80%

Financials

LASR vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between nLIGHT, Inc. and ASML Holding N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LASR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, nLIGHT, Inc. reported a gross profit of 24.95M and revenue of 81.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.7%.

ASML - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.47B and revenue of 8.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.1%.

LASR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, nLIGHT, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.41M and revenue of 81.19M, resulting in an operating margin of -6.7%.

ASML - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 2.51B and revenue of 8.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.8%.

LASR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, nLIGHT, Inc. reported a net income of -4.91M and revenue of 81.19M, resulting in a net margin of -6.1%.

ASML - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.07B and revenue of 8.43B, resulting in a net margin of 24.6%.