PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAR.TO vs. LTR.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LAR.TO vs. LTR.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Lithium Argentina AG (LAR.TO) and Liontown Resources Limited (LTR.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LAR.TO is traded in CAD, while LTR.AX is traded in AUD. To make them comparable, the LTR.AX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAR.TO achieves a 84.60% return, which is significantly higher than LTR.AX's 66.20% return. Over the past 10 years, LAR.TO has underperformed LTR.AX with an annualized return of 24.26%, while LTR.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 59.64% annualized return.


LAR.TO

1D
-5.80%
1M
0.71%
YTD
84.60%
6M
95.30%
1Y
450.19%
3Y*
7.23%
5Y*
12.65%
10Y*
24.26%

LTR.AX

1D
-3.30%
1M
1.45%
YTD
66.20%
6M
94.27%
1Y
370.24%
3Y*
-0.69%
5Y*
33.69%
10Y*
59.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAR.TO vs. LTR.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAR.TO
Lithium Argentina AG
84.60%102.65%-54.73%-19.20%-30.28%130.41%284.14%-3.48%-61.45%179.47%
LTR.AX
Liontown Resources Limited
66.20%208.61%-68.60%22.17%-20.16%371.39%321.72%245.71%-46.11%163.29%

Correlation

The correlation between LAR.TO and LTR.AX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009

0.11

The correlation between LAR.TO and LTR.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAR.TO vs. LTR.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAR.TO
LAR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LAR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LAR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

LTR.AX
LTR.AX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LTR.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTR.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTR.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
LTR.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTR.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAR.TO vs. LTR.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Argentina AG (LAR.TO) and Liontown Resources Limited (LTR.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAR.TOLTR.AXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.33

4.53

+0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.28

3.84

+0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.46

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

13.90

11.28

+2.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

35.53

28.41

+7.12

LAR.TO vs. LTR.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.33, which is comparable to the LTR.AX Sharpe Ratio of 4.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAR.TO and LTR.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LAR.TOLTR.AXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.33

4.53

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.42

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.58

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.30

-0.18

Drawdowns

LAR.TO vs. LTR.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAR.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.78%, roughly equal to the maximum LTR.AX drawdown of -96.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAR.TO and LTR.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAR.TOLTR.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.78%

-96.57%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.65%

-32.31%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.17%

-87.02%

+7.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.58%

-87.02%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.58%

-87.02%

-1.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.73%

-16.10%

-16.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.63%

-53.78%

-5.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.75%

12.88%

-0.13%

Volatility

LAR.TO vs. LTR.AX - Volatility Comparison

Lithium Argentina AG (LAR.TO) has a higher volatility of 21.15% compared to Liontown Resources Limited (LTR.AX) at 16.45%. This indicates that LAR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTR.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAR.TOLTR.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.15%

16.45%

+4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.32%

52.96%

+3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.33%

80.54%

+4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.77%

80.97%

-10.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.34%

102.54%

-30.20%

Dividends

LAR.TO vs. LTR.AX - Dividend Comparison

Neither LAR.TO nor LTR.AX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LAR.TO
Lithium Argentina AG
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LTR.AX
Liontown Resources Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.04%

Financials

LAR.TO vs. LTR.AX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lithium Argentina AG and Liontown Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. LAR.TO values in CAD, LTR.AX values in AUD

Frequently Asked Questions


LAR.TO and LTR.AX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAR.TO and LTR.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer