LAND vs. XLK
LAND (Gladstone Land Corporation) is a stock, while XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Over the past 10 years, LAND returned 2.00%/yr vs 25.48%/yr for XLK. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LAND vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAND achieves a -1.62% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 28.25% return. Over the past 10 years, LAND has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 2.00%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.48% annualized return.
LAND
- 1D
- 2.42%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- -1.62%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- -11.30%
- 3Y*
- -14.00%
- 5Y*
- -15.87%
- 10Y*
- 2.00%
XLK
- 1D
- -4.14%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 28.25%
- 6M
- 26.51%
- 1Y
- 52.47%
- 3Y*
- 30.61%
- 5Y*
- 21.34%
- 10Y*
- 25.48%
LAND vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | -1.62% | -10.69% | -21.63% | -18.49% | -44.42% | 136.25% | 17.35% | 18.07% | -10.82% | 24.66% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.25% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAND and XLK is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2013 | 0.23 |
The correlation between LAND and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAND vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
LAND
XLK
LAND vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LAND | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.38 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 3.31 | -3.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.75 | 10.56 | -11.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LAND vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAND drawdown since its inception was -76.45%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAND and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAND | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.45% | -82.05% | +5.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.47% | -15.92% | -14.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.24% | -25.66% | -19.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.45% | -33.56% | -42.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.45% | -33.56% | -42.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.85% | -6.96% | -67.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.79% | -34.90% | +4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.12% | 4.98% | +10.14% |
Volatility
LAND vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) is 6.67%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 12.51%. This indicates that LAND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAND | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 12.51% | -5.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.34% | 19.70% | +2.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.56% | 23.48% | +6.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.40% | 25.37% | +6.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 24.71% | +5.25% |
Dividends
LAND vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
LAND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, more than XLK's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | 6.40% | 6.12% | 5.16% | 3.83% | 2.98% | 1.60% | 3.67% | 4.12% | 4.63% | 3.90% | 4.40% | 5.38% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.43% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LAND and XLK have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (12.51%) compared to LAND (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAND dropped -76.45% vs XLK's -82.05%.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAND and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer