PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LALT vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LALT vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LALT achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.


LALT

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
10.70%
6M
10.50%
1Y
22.25%
3Y*
10.48%
5Y*
10Y*

KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LALT vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LALT
First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF
10.70%10.79%8.77%0.88%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.20%6.63%5.99%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between LALT and KNG is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

0.23

The correlation between LALT and KNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LALT vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LALT
KNG

Financial Services

31.4%
12.7%

Technology

22.1%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
5.5%

Industrials

7.7%
20.3%

Healthcare

7.3%
10.1%

Energy

5.8%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
23.5%

Communication Services

5.2%

-

Basic Materials

4.4%
10.2%

Real Estate

1.5%
4.4%

Utilities

1.2%
6.1%

Financial Services

LALT
31.4%
KNG
12.7%

Technology

LALT
22.1%
KNG
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

LALT
7.9%
KNG
5.5%

Industrials

LALT
7.7%
KNG
20.3%

Healthcare

LALT
7.3%
KNG
10.1%

Energy

LALT
5.8%
KNG
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

LALT
5.5%
KNG
23.5%

Communication Services

LALT
5.2%
KNG

-

Basic Materials

LALT
4.4%
KNG
10.2%

Real Estate

LALT
1.5%
KNG
4.4%

Utilities

LALT
1.2%
KNG
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LALT vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LALT
LALT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
LALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LALT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LALT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LALT vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LALTKNGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.28

0.73

+2.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.62

1.15

+3.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.13

+0.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.79

0.87

+6.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

30.25

2.25

+28.00

LALT vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LALT Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is higher than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LALT and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LALTKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.28

0.73

+2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.62

0.49

+1.13

Drawdowns

LALT vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LALT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LALT and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LALTKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-35.12%

+28.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-8.61%

+5.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.97%

-14.24%

+7.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-5.89%

+5.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

-4.13%

+3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

3.32%

-2.58%

Volatility

LALT vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) is 1.23%, while FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) has a volatility of 2.29%. This indicates that LALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LALTKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

2.29%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.40%

7.39%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.81%

10.19%

-3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.78%

13.59%

-7.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.78%

17.18%

-11.40%

LALT vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LALT has a 1.94% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

LALT vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

LALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than KNG's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%
LALT
First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF
3.68%2.03%2.06%2.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LALT and KNG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNG has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to LALT (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LALT dropped -6.97% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 3-year performance, LALT leads with 10.48% vs 7.06% for KNG. On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, LALT has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, LALT has performed better with a 10.48% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for LALT.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 3.68% for LALT.

LALT is categorized as Global Allocation, while KNG is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 1.94% for LALT and 0.75% for KNG.

LALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LALT and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer