LAGVX vs. GLFOX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LAGVX (Lord Abbett Income Fund) and GLFOX (Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares) are both mutual funds - LAGVX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by Lord Abbett, while GLFOX is a Global Equities fund managed by Lazard. Over the past 10 years, LAGVX returned 2.93%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for GLFOX. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LAGVX charges 0.73%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for GLFOX.

Performance

LAGVX vs. GLFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Income Fund (LAGVX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAGVX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than GLFOX's 7.26% return. Over the past 10 years, LAGVX has underperformed GLFOX with an annualized return of 2.93%, while GLFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.01% annualized return.

LAGVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: 0.57%
• 6M: 0.61%
• 1Y: 6.82%
• 3Y*: 5.51%
• 5Y*: 0.63%
• 10Y*: 2.93%

GLFOX

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -1.97%
• YTD: 7.26%
• 6M: 7.41%
• 1Y: 15.22%
• 3Y*: 13.64%
• 5Y*: 11.01%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAGVX vs. GLFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LAGVX Lord Abbett Income Fund	0.57%	8.29%	2.50%	8.23%	-16.34%	1.39%	7.98%	12.96%	-2.65%	6.94%
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares	7.26%	23.53%	6.43%	10.59%	-1.59%	19.67%	-4.71%	21.95%	-4.06%	20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between LAGVX and GLFOX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010	0.11

The correlation between LAGVX and GLFOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.38 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LAGVX vs. GLFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAGVX

LAGVX Risk / Return Rank: 28
LAGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
LAGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
LAGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
LAGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
LAGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

GLFOX

GLFOX Risk / Return Rank: 23
GLFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
GLFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
GLFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
GLFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
GLFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAGVX vs. GLFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Income Fund (LAGVX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LAGVX	GLFOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.43	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	1.94	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.27	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	1.70	+0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.61	5.74	+0.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LAGVX vs. GLFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAGVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the GLFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAGVX and GLFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LAGVX	GLFOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	1.43	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	1.01	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.75	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.82	-0.09

Drawdowns

LAGVX vs. GLFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAGVX drawdown since its inception was -21.70%, smaller than the maximum GLFOX drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAGVX and GLFOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAGVX	GLFOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.70%	-29.65%	+7.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.61%	-9.01%	+5.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.25%	-10.07%	+3.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.70%	-17.14%	-4.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.70%	-29.65%	+7.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-5.85%	+4.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-3.42%	-0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	2.67%	-1.57%

Volatility

LAGVX vs. GLFOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Income Fund (LAGVX) is 1.95%, while Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that LAGVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAGVX	GLFOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.95%	4.51%	-2.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.77%	9.32%	-5.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.13%	10.74%	-5.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.71%	11.00%	-4.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.95%	13.34%	-7.39%

LAGVX vs. GLFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAGVX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than GLFOX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

LAGVX vs. GLFOX - Dividend Comparison

LAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, less than GLFOX's 6.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares	6.10%	6.03%	4.00%	2.69%	14.50%	6.02%	2.39%	4.20%	13.99%	6.82%	2.07%	11.01%
LAGVX Lord Abbett Income Fund	5.40%	5.44%	4.57%	4.48%	3.15%	4.81%	3.46%	3.85%	4.27%	3.49%	3.94%	4.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LAGVX and GLFOX in my portfolio?

LAGVX and GLFOX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LAGVX or GLFOX?

GLFOX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to LAGVX (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAGVX dropped -21.70% vs GLFOX's -29.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.