LAGVX vs. EADOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Income Fund (LAGVX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A (EADOX).
LAGVX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Jan 4, 1982. EADOX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Sep 3, 2015.
Performance
LAGVX vs. EADOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LAGVX vs. EADOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAGVX Lord Abbett Income Fund | -1.15% | 8.29% | 2.50% | 8.23% | -16.34% | 1.39% | 7.98% | 12.96% | -2.65% | 6.94% |
EADOX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A | 1.47% | 16.93% | 14.52% | 11.13% | -6.42% | 1.24% | 7.12% | 17.85% | -4.44% | 12.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAGVX achieves a -1.15% return, which is significantly lower than EADOX's 1.47% return. Over the past 10 years, LAGVX has underperformed EADOX with an annualized return of 3.04%, while EADOX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.58% annualized return.
LAGVX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- -1.15%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.62%
- 5Y*
- 0.52%
- 10Y*
- 3.04%
EADOX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 6.71%
- 1Y
- 14.97%
- 3Y*
- 13.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- 7.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LAGVX vs. EADOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LAGVX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than EADOX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LAGVX vs. EADOX — Risk / Return Rank
LAGVX
EADOX
LAGVX vs. EADOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Income Fund (LAGVX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A (EADOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LAGVX | EADOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 4.12 | -3.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 5.77 | -4.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 2.06 | -0.88 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 4.06 | -2.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 16.37 | -11.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LAGVX | EADOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 4.12 | -3.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 1.71 | -1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 1.61 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 1.63 | -0.89 |
Correlation
The correlation between LAGVX and EADOX is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LAGVX vs. EADOX - Dividend Comparison
LAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, less than EADOX's 10.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAGVX Lord Abbett Income Fund | 5.05% | 5.44% | 4.57% | 4.48% | 3.15% | 4.81% | 3.46% | 3.85% | 4.27% | 3.49% | 3.94% | 4.70% |
EADOX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A | 10.84% | 10.51% | 8.27% | 8.73% | 8.87% | 7.56% | 7.42% | 7.57% | 7.83% | 7.61% | 4.04% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LAGVX vs. EADOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAGVX drawdown since its inception was -21.70%, which is greater than EADOX's maximum drawdown of -19.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAGVX and EADOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAGVX | EADOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.70% | -19.15% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.69% | -3.61% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.70% | -17.56% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.70% | -19.15% | -2.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -3.50% | +0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.01% | -2.56% | -1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | 0.90% | +0.24% |
Volatility
LAGVX vs. EADOX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Income Fund (LAGVX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A (EADOX) have volatilities of 1.80% and 1.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LAGVX | EADOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.80% | 1.77% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.28% | 2.67% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.42% | 3.61% | +1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.65% | 4.53% | +2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 4.72% | +1.20% |