PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAFFX vs. LIFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LAFFX vs. LIFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) and Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAFFX achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly higher than LIFIX's 2.03% return. Over the past 10 years, LAFFX has outperformed LIFIX with an annualized return of 10.75%, while LIFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.99% annualized return.


LAFFX

1D
0.14%
1M
2.53%
YTD
9.14%
6M
9.55%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
18.57%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
10.75%

LIFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.13%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.09%
1Y
5.66%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
3.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAFFX vs. LIFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAFFX
Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund
9.14%15.75%17.30%10.50%-9.80%26.77%-1.29%25.24%-7.59%16.16%
LIFIX
Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund
2.03%7.16%4.81%3.87%-5.34%10.43%6.05%5.17%-1.06%1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LAFFX and LIFIX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2011

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between LAFFX and LIFIX has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAFFX vs. LIFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAFFX
LAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

LIFIX
LIFIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
LIFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
LIFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAFFX vs. LIFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) and Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAFFXLIFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.55

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

4.42

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.24

19.68

-7.43

LAFFX vs. LIFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAFFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the LIFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAFFX and LIFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LAFFXLIFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.41

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.79

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.88

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.50

-0.05

Drawdowns

LAFFX vs. LIFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAFFX drawdown since its inception was -60.50%, which is greater than LIFIX's maximum drawdown of -18.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAFFX and LIFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAFFXLIFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.50%

-18.02%

-42.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-1.27%

-6.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.38%

-2.11%

-13.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

-8.49%

-11.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.59%

-18.02%

-21.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.08%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-3.23%

-5.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

0.28%

+1.53%

Volatility

LAFFX vs. LIFIX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX) at 0.74%. This indicates that LAFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAFFXLIFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

0.74%

+2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.36%

1.67%

+6.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

2.33%

+8.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

4.01%

+10.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

4.53%

+12.92%

LAFFX vs. LIFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAFFX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than LIFIX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

LAFFX vs. LIFIX - Dividend Comparison

LAFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.59%, more than LIFIX's 4.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAFFX
Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund
6.59%7.49%6.32%1.69%7.86%3.86%1.93%4.31%11.75%11.96%7.76%10.67%
LIFIX
Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund
4.92%4.94%4.17%3.88%2.77%2.55%3.77%4.15%4.18%3.96%4.43%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


LAFFX and LIFIX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAFFX has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to LIFIX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAFFX dropped -60.50% vs LIFIX's -18.02%.

LIFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAFFX and LIFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer