LAFFX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
LAFFX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Jan 3, 1950. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LAFFX or SCHG.
Performance
LAFFX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAFFX achieves a 23.90% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 32.97% return. Over the past 10 years, LAFFX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 4.54%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.46% annualized return.
LAFFX
23.90%
3.77%
13.61%
30.99%
7.99%
4.54%
SCHG
32.97%
4.60%
14.88%
38.45%
20.43%
16.46%
Key characteristics
LAFFX | SCHG | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 2.82 | 2.26 |
Sortino Ratio | 3.99 | 2.95 |
Omega Ratio | 1.51 | 1.41 |
Calmar Ratio | 2.65 | 3.11 |
Martin Ratio | 19.20 | 12.34 |
Ulcer Index | 1.61% | 3.12% |
Daily Std Dev | 10.97% | 16.99% |
Max Drawdown | -64.67% | -34.59% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -1.19% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LAFFX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LAFFX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between LAFFX and SCHG is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LAFFX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LAFFX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
LAFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than SCHG's 0.40% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund | 1.36% | 1.69% | 1.93% | 1.42% | 1.92% | 2.18% | 2.48% | 2.21% | 2.43% | 2.54% | 2.16% | 1.88% |
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
LAFFX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAFFX drawdown since its inception was -64.67%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAFFX and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LAFFX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) is 3.72%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that LAFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.