LAES vs. MOB

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

LAES (SEALSQ Corp) and MOB (Mobilicom Limited American Depositary Shares) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — LAES in Semiconductors, MOB in Communication Equipment. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LAES vs. MOB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEALSQ Corp (LAES) and Mobilicom Limited American Depositary Shares (MOB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAES achieves a -17.99% return, which is significantly lower than MOB's 2.30% return.

LAES

• 1D: -3.13%
• 1M: 4.73%
• YTD: -17.99%
• 6M: -26.89%
• 1Y: -27.06%
• 3Y*: -33.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MOB

• 1D: 6.85%
• 1M: 7.03%
• YTD: 2.30%
• 6M: -11.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAES vs. MOB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LAES SEALSQ Corp	-17.99%	-22.22%
MOB Mobilicom Limited American Depositary Shares	2.30%	-25.52%

Correlation

The correlation between LAES and MOB is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025	0.49

Fundamentals

EPS LAES : -$0.43 MOB : -$3.88
PS Ratio LAES : 10.21 MOB : 7.81
Total Revenue (TTM) LAES : $35.37M MOB : $6.54M
Gross Profit (TTM) LAES : $13.21M MOB : $3.62M
EBITDA (TTM) LAES : -$41.81M MOB : -$31.15M

Return for Risk

LAES vs. MOB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAES

LAES Risk / Return Rank: 35
LAES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
LAES Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
LAES Omega Ratio Rank: 40
LAES Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
LAES Martin Ratio Rank: 32

MOB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAES vs. MOB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEALSQ Corp (LAES) and Mobilicom Limited American Depositary Shares (MOB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LAES	MOB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.25	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.37	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.62	—	—

Drawdowns

LAES vs. MOB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAES drawdown since its inception was -98.44%, which is greater than MOB's maximum drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAES and MOB.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAES	MOB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.44%	-50.00%	-48.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-98.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-85.89%	-32.61%	-53.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.60%	-29.98%	-54.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.58%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LAES	MOB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.38%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.23%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	109.13%	112.49%	-3.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	170.29%	112.49%	+57.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	170.29%	112.49%	+57.80%

Dividends

LAES vs. MOB - Dividend Comparison

Neither LAES nor MOB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LAES and MOB in my portfolio?

LAES and MOB have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.