PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAES vs. DAVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LAES vs. DAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEALSQ Corp (LAES) and Dave Inc. (DAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAES achieves a -17.99% return, which is significantly lower than DAVE's 29.52% return.


LAES

1D
-3.13%
1M
4.73%
YTD
-17.99%
6M
-26.89%
1Y
-27.06%
3Y*
-33.31%
5Y*
10Y*

DAVE

1D
0.47%
1M
19.46%
YTD
29.52%
6M
45.12%
1Y
20.37%
3Y*
269.82%
5Y*
-2.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAES vs. DAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LAES
SEALSQ Corp
-17.99%-38.54%380.47%-92.82%
DAVE
Dave Inc.
29.52%154.73%936.61%55.42%

Correlation

The correlation between LAES and DAVE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023

0.28

The correlation between LAES and DAVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

LAES:

-$0.43

DAVE:

$15.54

PS Ratio

LAES:

10.21

DAVE:

7.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAES:

$35.37M

DAVE:

$551.52M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAES:

$13.21M

DAVE:

$427.68M

EBITDA (TTM)

LAES:

-$41.81M

DAVE:

$165.95M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAES vs. DAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAES
LAES Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
LAES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAES Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAES Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LAES Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAES Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

DAVE
DAVE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAES vs. DAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEALSQ Corp (LAES) and Dave Inc. (DAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LAESDAVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.11

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

0.46

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.62

0.82

-1.44

LAES vs. DAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAES Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the DAVE Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAES and DAVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LAES vs. DAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAES drawdown since its inception was -98.44%, roughly equal to the maximum DAVE drawdown of -99.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAES and DAVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAESDAVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.44%

-99.01%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.68%

-44.67%

-28.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.07%

-44.67%

-53.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.89%

-37.33%

-48.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.60%

-68.91%

-15.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.58%

24.93%

+18.65%

Volatility

LAES vs. DAVE - Volatility Comparison

SEALSQ Corp (LAES) has a higher volatility of 28.38% compared to Dave Inc. (DAVE) at 18.61%. This indicates that LAES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAESDAVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.38%

18.61%

+9.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.23%

48.97%

+17.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.13%

74.00%

+35.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

170.29%

98.44%

+71.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

170.29%

97.16%

+73.13%

Dividends

LAES vs. DAVE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LAES nor DAVE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LAES vs. DAVE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SEALSQ Corp and Dave Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
5.60M
147.59M
(LAES) Total Revenue
(DAVE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LAES and DAVE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAES has higher volatility (28.38%) compared to DAVE (18.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAES dropped -98.44% vs DAVE's -99.01%.

DAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAES and DAVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer