LAES vs. AEVA
LAES (SEALSQ Corp) and AEVA (Aeva Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. LAES operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while AEVA operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, LAES returned -33.31%/yr vs 50.17%/yr for AEVA. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LAES vs. AEVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAES achieves a -17.99% return, which is significantly lower than AEVA's 87.42% return.
LAES
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- -17.99%
- 6M
- -26.89%
- 1Y
- -27.06%
- 3Y*
- -33.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AEVA
- 1D
- 5.87%
- 1M
- 22.85%
- YTD
- 87.42%
- 6M
- 55.47%
- 1Y
- 5.15%
- 3Y*
- 50.17%
- 5Y*
- -14.89%
- 10Y*
- —
LAES vs. AEVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LAES SEALSQ Corp | -17.99% | -38.54% | 380.47% | -92.82% |
AEVA Aeva Technologies, Inc. | 87.42% | 179.58% | 25.38% | -31.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAES and AEVA is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023 | 0.27 |
The correlation between LAES and AEVA shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LAES:
-$0.43
AEVA:
-$2.52
LAES:
10.21
AEVA:
68.46
LAES:
$35.37M
AEVA:
$20.97M
LAES:
$13.21M
AEVA:
$971.00K
LAES:
-$41.81M
AEVA:
$21.17M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAES vs. AEVA — Risk / Return Rank
LAES
AEVA
LAES vs. AEVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEALSQ Corp (LAES) and Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LAES | AEVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.11 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 0.07 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 0.09 | -0.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LAES vs. AEVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAES drawdown since its inception was -98.44%, roughly equal to the maximum AEVA drawdown of -97.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAES and AEVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAES | AEVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.44% | -97.71% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.68% | -75.68% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.07% | -75.68% | -22.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -96.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.89% | -75.11% | -10.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.60% | -70.65% | -13.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.58% | 56.11% | -12.53% |
Volatility
LAES vs. AEVA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SEALSQ Corp (LAES) is 28.38%, while Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA) has a volatility of 32.26%. This indicates that LAES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAES | AEVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.38% | 32.26% | -3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.23% | 78.67% | -12.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 109.13% | 114.70% | -5.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 170.29% | 96.96% | +73.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 170.29% | 91.27% | +79.02% |
Dividends
LAES vs. AEVA - Dividend Comparison
Neither LAES nor AEVA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LAES vs. AEVA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SEALSQ Corp and Aeva Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LAES and AEVA have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AEVA has higher volatility (32.26%) compared to LAES (28.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAES dropped -98.44% vs AEVA's -97.71%.
AEVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAES and AEVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer