AEVA vs. ROG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA) and Rogers Corporation (ROG).

Performance

AEVA vs. ROG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA) and Rogers Corporation (ROG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AEVA vs. ROG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AEVA Aeva Technologies, Inc.	-0.90%	179.58%	25.38%	-44.29%	-82.01%	-48.01%	47.61%
ROG Rogers Corporation	17.21%	-9.88%	-23.06%	10.67%	-56.29%	75.80%	35.45%

Fundamentals

EPS AEVA : -$2.60 ROG : -$5.04
PS Ratio AEVA : 40.74 ROG : 1.62
Total Revenue (TTM) AEVA : $18.08M ROG : $810.80M
Gross Profit (TTM) AEVA : -$660.00K ROG : $256.80M
EBITDA (TTM) AEVA : $28.17M ROG : $77.60M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEVA achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than ROG's 17.21% return.

AEVA

• 1D: 13.25%
• 1M: -0.75%
• YTD: -0.90%
• 6M: -9.24%
• 1Y: 88.00%
• 3Y*: 30.29%
• 5Y*: -26.73%
• 10Y*: —

ROG

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -0.46%
• YTD: 17.21%
• 6M: 33.40%
• 1Y: 58.94%
• 3Y*: -13.08%
• 5Y*: -11.04%
• 10Y*: 6.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AEVA vs. ROG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEVA

AEVA Risk / Return Rank: 68
AEVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
AEVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
AEVA Omega Ratio Rank: 69
AEVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
AEVA Martin Ratio Rank: 60

ROG

ROG Risk / Return Rank: 81
ROG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ROG Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ROG Omega Ratio Rank: 77
ROG Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ROG Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEVA vs. ROG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA) and Rogers Corporation (ROG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AEVA	ROG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	1.46	-0.71
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	1.96	-0.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.26	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	2.43	-1.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.88	8.55	-6.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AEVA vs. ROG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEVA Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the ROG Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEVA and ROG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AEVA	ROG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74	1.46	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.28	-0.28	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.22	0.06	-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between AEVA and ROG is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AEVA vs. ROG - Dividend Comparison

Neither AEVA nor ROG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AEVA vs. ROG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEVA drawdown since its inception was -97.71%, which is greater than ROG's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEVA and ROG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEVA	ROG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.71%	-83.13%	-14.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-75.68%	-24.18%	-51.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.33%	-80.77%	-15.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.84%	-60.82%	-26.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.34%	-32.55%	-37.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	51.15%	6.88%	+44.27%

Volatility

AEVA vs. ROG - Volatility Comparison

Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA) has a higher volatility of 30.85% compared to Rogers Corporation (ROG) at 10.71%. This indicates that AEVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AEVA	ROG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	30.85%	10.71%	+20.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	79.41%	25.05%	+54.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	119.11%	40.63%	+78.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	95.68%	39.52%	+56.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.50%	42.71%	+47.79%

Financials