LACG vs. OOQB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LACG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF) and OOQB (Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LACG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while OOQB is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

LACG vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF (LACG) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LACG achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly higher than OOQB's -18.43% return.

LACG

• 1D: -18.39%
• 1M: -15.91%
• YTD: 4.44%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OOQB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -18.43%
• 6M: -24.99%
• 1Y: -27.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LACG vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LACG Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF	4.44%	-35.14%
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	-18.43%	-7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between LACG and OOQB is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	0.45

Return for Risk

LACG vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OOQB

OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 4
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LACG vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF (LACG) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LACG	OOQB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.37	-0.41	+0.03

Drawdowns

LACG vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LACG drawdown since its inception was -71.00%, which is greater than OOQB's maximum drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LACG and OOQB.

Drawdown Indicators

	LACG	OOQB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.00%	-53.44%	-17.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-53.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.60%	-43.69%	-6.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.57%	-23.26%	-19.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	30.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LACG	OOQB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	39.39%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	151.78%	51.57%	+100.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	151.78%	58.12%	+93.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	151.78%	58.12%	+93.66%

LACG vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LACG and OOQB have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

LACG vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison

LACG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OOQB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%.

Position	TTM	2025
LACG Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	11.62%	9.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LACG and OOQB in my portfolio?

LACG and OOQB have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LACG or OOQB?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LACG or OOQB?

LACG and OOQB have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LACG or OOQB?

OOQB has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 0.00% for LACG.

What is the main difference between LACG and OOQB?

LACG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OOQB is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Volatility Shares.