LACG vs. CIFG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LACG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF) and CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

LACG vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF (LACG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LACG achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly lower than CIFG's 92.34% return.

LACG

• 1D: -18.39%
• 1M: -15.91%
• YTD: 4.44%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIFG

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 94.51%
• YTD: 92.34%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LACG vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LACG Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF	4.44%	-35.14%
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF	92.34%	-42.39%

Correlation

The correlation between LACG and CIFG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	0.57

Return for Risk

LACG vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF (LACG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LACG	CIFG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.37	0.12	-0.49

Drawdowns

LACG vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LACG drawdown since its inception was -71.00%, roughly equal to the maximum CIFG drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LACG and CIFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	LACG	CIFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.00%	-71.71%	+0.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.60%	-0.35%	-50.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.57%	-38.01%	-4.56%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LACG	CIFG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	151.78%	203.83%	-52.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	151.78%	203.83%	-52.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	151.78%	203.83%	-52.05%

LACG vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LACG and CIFG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

LACG vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison

Neither LACG nor CIFG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LACG and CIFG in my portfolio?

LACG and CIFG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LACG or CIFG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LACG or CIFG?

LACG and CIFG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LACG or CIFG?

LACG and CIFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.