LAC vs. SIRI

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

LAC (Lithium Americas Corp.) and SIRI (Sirius XM Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. LAC operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while SIRI operates in Broadcasting (Communication Services). Over the past year, LAC returned 73.00% vs 31.77% for SIRI. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LAC vs. SIRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAC achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly lower than SIRI's 40.80% return.

LAC

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: -16.97%
• YTD: 4.36%
• 6M: -11.13%
• 1Y: 73.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SIRI

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 4.40%
• YTD: 40.80%
• 6M: 29.44%
• 1Y: 31.77%
• 3Y*: -6.96%
• 5Y*: -13.30%
• 10Y*: -1.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAC vs. SIRI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	4.36%	46.80%	-53.59%	-27.19%
SIRI Sirius XM Holdings Inc.	40.80%	-7.97%	-56.93%	21.67%

Correlation

The correlation between LAC and SIRI is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap LAC : $1.61B SIRI : $9.30B
EPS LAC : -$0.28 SIRI : $2.41
PB Ratio LAC : 1.19 SIRI : 0.79
Total Revenue (TTM) LAC : $0.00 SIRI : $8.58B
Gross Profit (TTM) LAC : -$580.22K SIRI : $4.10B
EBITDA (TTM) LAC : -$52.10M SIRI : $1.77B

Return for Risk

LAC vs. SIRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAC

LAC Risk / Return Rank: 69
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 76
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 61

SIRI

SIRI Risk / Return Rank: 70
SIRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SIRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SIRI Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SIRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
SIRI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAC vs. SIRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LAC	SIRI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	0.91	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	1.54	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.18	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	1.83	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.77	3.60	-1.84

LAC vs. SIRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the SIRI Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAC and SIRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LAC vs. SIRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAC drawdown since its inception was -81.83%, smaller than the maximum SIRI drawdown of -99.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAC and SIRI.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAC	SIRI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.83%	-99.92%	+18.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.08%	-17.44%	-45.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-73.87%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-73.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-73.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.18%	-94.74%	+33.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.13%	-80.54%	+17.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.47%	8.85%	+32.62%

Volatility

LAC vs. SIRI - Volatility Comparison

Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) has a higher volatility of 22.78% compared to Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) at 9.98%. This indicates that LAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAC	SIRI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.78%	9.98%	+12.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.55%	23.81%	+29.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	132.17%	35.40%	+96.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	101.55%	44.90%	+56.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	101.55%	37.67%	+63.88%

Dividends

LAC vs. SIRI - Dividend Comparison

LAC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIRI Sirius XM Holdings Inc.	3.92%	5.40%	4.68%	1.81%	5.82%	1.04%	0.86%	0.69%	0.79%	0.76%	0.22%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LAC and SIRI in my portfolio?

LAC and SIRI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LAC or SIRI?

LAC has higher volatility (22.78%) compared to SIRI (9.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAC dropped -81.83% vs SIRI's -99.92%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.