PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LABX vs. XDSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LABX vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF (LABX) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABX achieves a 201.86% return, which is significantly higher than XDSQ's 2.80% return.


LABX

1D
4.15%
1M
194.55%
YTD
201.86%
6M
234.95%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDSQ

1D
0.01%
1M
1.59%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.86%
1Y
15.98%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LABX vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LABX
Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF
201.86%-46.45%
XDSQ
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF
2.80%7.10%

Correlation

The correlation between LABX and XDSQ is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LABX vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LABX

XDSQ
XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LABX vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF (LABX) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LABX vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LABXXDSQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.69

-0.25

Drawdowns

LABX vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABX drawdown since its inception was -90.93%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABX and XDSQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LABXXDSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.93%

-26.06%

-64.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

0.00%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.60%

-4.96%

-52.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

Volatility

LABX vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LABXXDSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

185.47%

10.56%

+174.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

185.47%

15.27%

+170.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

185.47%

15.10%

+170.37%

LABX vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

LABX vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither LABX nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LABX and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LABX.

LABX and XDSQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LABX and 0.79% for XDSQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LABX and XDSQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer