LABD vs. QTJL
LABD (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LABD is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, LABD returned -46.59%/yr vs 9.06%/yr for QTJL. Their -0.51 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. LABD charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
LABD vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LABD achieves a -55.11% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 2.56% return.
LABD
- 1D
- 8.48%
- 1M
- 26.56%
- 6M
- -50.76%
- YTD
- -55.11%
- 1Y
- -85.49%
- 3Y*
- -58.18%
- 5Y*
- -46.59%
- 10Y*
- -56.42%
- ALL TIME*
- -55.10%
QTJL
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- 11.97%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.06%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $66.43M | $107.77M | $90.23M | |
| $200.88K | $354.66K | $247.25K |
LABD vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABD Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares | -55.11% | -70.07% | -21.43% | -41.77% | -32.68% | 33.37% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 2.56% | 21.07% | 16.50% | 42.39% | -30.16% | 9.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between LABD and QTJL is -0.38, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | -0.51 |
The correlation between LABD and QTJL shifts across timeframes, from -0.52 (5 years) to -0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LABD vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
LABD
QTJL
LABD vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LABD | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.72 | 1.18 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 1.23 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 6.04 | -7.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LABD vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LABD drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABD and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LABD | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -33.40% | -66.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -89.59% | -8.48% | -81.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.43% | -22.43% | -75.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.04% | -33.40% | -65.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -4.62% | -95.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.08% | -7.74% | -83.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 67.04% | 1.73% | +65.31% |
Volatility
LABD vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) has a higher volatility of 24.34% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 6.45%. This indicates that LABD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LABD | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.34% | 6.45% | +17.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.59% | 9.63% | +55.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.29% | 11.72% | +68.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.73% | 20.43% | +76.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.74% | 20.30% | +75.44% |
LABD vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LABD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
LABD vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
LABD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABD Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares | 7.00% | 6.67% | 4.68% | 6.13% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 3.94% | 1.75% | 0.81% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LABD and QTJL have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LABD has higher volatility (24.34%) compared to QTJL (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABD dropped -100.00% vs QTJL's -33.40%.
On 5-year performance, QTJL leads with 9.06% vs -46.59% for LABD. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 6.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 9.06% return vs -46.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for LABD.
LABD has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for LABD and 0.79% for QTJL.
QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LABD and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer