LABD vs. LABU
LABD (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares) and LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - LABD tracks the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (-300%) while LABU tracks the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LABD returned -55.90%/yr vs -13.92%/yr for LABU. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. LABD charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for LABU.
Performance
LABD vs. LABU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LABD achieves a -26.35% return, which is significantly lower than LABU's -0.77% return. Over the past 10 years, LABD has underperformed LABU with an annualized return of -55.90%, while LABU has yielded a comparatively higher -13.92% annualized return.
LABD
- 1D
- 13.36%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- -26.35%
- 6M
- -33.91%
- 1Y
- -80.10%
- 3Y*
- -49.03%
- 5Y*
- -40.90%
- 10Y*
- -55.90%
LABU
- 1D
- -12.94%
- 1M
- -8.90%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 7.41%
- 1Y
- 193.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.21%
- 5Y*
- -33.29%
- 10Y*
- -13.92%
LABD vs. LABU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABD Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares | -26.35% | -70.07% | -21.43% | -41.77% | -32.68% | 1.86% | -89.75% | -70.80% | -6.26% | -75.67% |
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | -0.77% | 79.17% | -26.02% | -13.41% | -80.36% | -64.15% | 74.66% | 75.50% | -57.61% | 149.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between LABD and LABU is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015 | -1.00 |
The correlation between LABD and LABU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LABD vs. LABU — Risk / Return Rank
LABD
LABU
LABD vs. LABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LABD | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | 2.57 | -3.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | 2.91 | -5.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.34 | -0.59 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 7.09 | -8.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 20.95 | -22.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LABD | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.06 | 2.57 | -3.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.43 | -0.35 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.58 | -0.15 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | -0.24 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
LABD vs. LABU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LABD drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, roughly equal to the maximum LABU drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABD and LABU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LABD | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -99.18% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -83.21% | -30.70% | -52.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.31% | -78.30% | -17.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.24% | -97.59% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | -98.96% | -1.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -96.50% | -3.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.92% | -81.67% | -9.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.04% | 10.40% | +51.64% |
Volatility
LABD vs. LABU - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) have volatilities of 28.02% and 28.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LABD | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.02% | 28.40% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.98% | 60.11% | +1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.01% | 76.20% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.24% | 95.56% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.94% | 95.43% | +0.51% |
LABD vs. LABU - Expense Ratio Comparison
LABD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than LABU's 1.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
LABD vs. LABU - Dividend Comparison
LABD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%, more than LABU's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABD Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares | 6.14% | 6.67% | 4.68% | 6.13% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 3.94% | 1.75% | 0.81% | 0.00% |
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.35% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.64% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LABD and LABU have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LABU has higher volatility (28.40%) compared to LABD (28.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABD dropped -99.99% vs LABU's -99.18%.
On 10-year performance, LABU leads with -13.92% vs -55.90% for LABD. On fees, LABD is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, LABD has been the lower-risk option at 28.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, LABU has performed better with a -13.92% return vs -55.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LABD is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for LABU.
LABD has the higher dividend yield at 6.14%, compared with 0.78% for LABU.
LABD tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (-300%), while LABU tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.06% for LABD and 1.12% for LABU.
LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LABD and LABU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer