LABD vs. KOLD
LABD (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares) and KOLD (ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas) are both exchange-traded funds - LABD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (-300%), while KOLD is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LABD returned -56.42%/yr vs -22.29%/yr for KOLD. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LABD charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KOLD.
Performance
LABD vs. KOLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LABD achieves a -55.11% return, which is significantly lower than KOLD's -16.81% return. Over the past 10 years, LABD has underperformed KOLD with an annualized return of -56.42%, while KOLD has yielded a comparatively higher -22.29% annualized return.
LABD
- 1D
- 8.48%
- 1M
- 26.56%
- 6M
- -50.76%
- YTD
- -55.11%
- 1Y
- -85.49%
- 3Y*
- -58.18%
- 5Y*
- -46.59%
- 10Y*
- -56.42%
- ALL TIME*
- -55.10%
KOLD
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 25.17%
- 6M
- 116.05%
- YTD
- -16.81%
- 1Y
- -4.80%
- 3Y*
- -1.53%
- 5Y*
- -30.36%
- 10Y*
- -22.29%
- ALL TIME*
- -11.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $57.12M | $61.92M | $74.91M | |
| $66.43M | $107.77M | $90.23M |
LABD vs. KOLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABD Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares | -55.11% | -70.07% | -21.43% | -41.77% | -32.68% | 1.86% | -89.75% | -70.80% | -6.26% | -75.67% |
KOLD ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas | -16.81% | -17.48% | -11.34% | 249.82% | -88.62% | -74.44% | 22.05% | 82.94% | -46.48% | 72.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between LABD and KOLD is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015 | 0.01 |
The correlation between LABD and KOLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.01 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LABD vs. KOLD — Risk / Return Rank
LABD
KOLD
LABD vs. KOLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) and ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas (KOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LABD | KOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.72 | 1.10 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | -0.07 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | -0.12 | -1.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LABD vs. KOLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LABD drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum KOLD drawdown of -99.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABD and KOLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LABD | KOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -99.45% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -89.59% | -72.50% | -17.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.43% | -84.34% | -13.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.04% | -97.46% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.99% | -99.45% | -0.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -96.60% | -3.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.08% | -69.77% | -21.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 67.04% | 40.92% | +26.12% |
Volatility
LABD vs. KOLD - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) has a higher volatility of 24.34% compared to ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas (KOLD) at 17.96%. This indicates that LABD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KOLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LABD | KOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.34% | 17.96% | +6.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.59% | 71.96% | -6.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.29% | 110.38% | -30.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.73% | 118.81% | -22.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.74% | 101.60% | -5.86% |
LABD vs. KOLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LABD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than KOLD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
LABD vs. KOLD - Dividend Comparison
LABD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, while KOLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KOLD ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LABD Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares | 7.00% | 6.67% | 4.68% | 6.13% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 3.94% | 1.75% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LABD and KOLD have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LABD has higher volatility (24.34%) compared to KOLD (17.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABD dropped -100.00% vs KOLD's -99.45%.
On 10-year performance, KOLD leads with -22.29% vs -56.42% for LABD. On fees, KOLD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, KOLD has been the lower-risk option at 17.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, KOLD has performed better with a -22.29% return vs -56.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KOLD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for LABD.
LABD has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 0.00% for KOLD.
LABD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KOLD is Oil & Gas. LABD tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (-300%), while KOLD tracks Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for LABD and 0.95% for KOLD.
KOLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LABD and KOLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer