L.TO vs. VST
L.TO (Loblaw Companies Limited) and VST (Vistra Corp.) are both stocks. L.TO operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive), while VST operates in Utilities - Independent Power Producers (Utilities). Over the past 5 years, L.TO returned 33.11%/yr vs 64.11%/yr for VST. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
L.TO vs. VST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
L.TO is traded in CAD, while VST is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VST values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, L.TO achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than VST's 7.60% return.
L.TO
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 2.62%
- 6M
- 2.89%
- 1Y
- 15.10%
- 3Y*
- 34.35%
- 5Y*
- 33.11%
- 10Y*
- 26.65%
VST
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- 10.28%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- 1Y
- -5.99%
- 3Y*
- 94.91%
- 5Y*
- 64.11%
- 10Y*
- —
L.TO vs. VST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L.TO Loblaw Companies Limited | 2.62% | 34.69% | 54.55% | 13.67% | 21.98% | 76.92% | 1.32% | 17.76% | 51.51% | 4.10% |
VST Vistra Corp. | 7.60% | 12.29% | 292.14% | 66.67% | 11.73% | 19.51% | -13.96% | -1.76% | 35.45% | 10.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between L.TO and VST is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2016 | 0.04 |
The correlation between L.TO and VST shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
L.TO:
CA$3.72
VST:
$8.60
L.TO:
17.05
VST:
19.44
L.TO:
0.73
VST:
2.48
L.TO:
CA$64.25B
VST:
$17.20B
L.TO:
CA$19.91B
VST:
$1.12B
L.TO:
CA$7.21B
VST:
$4.34B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
L.TO vs. VST — Risk / Return Rank
L.TO
VST
L.TO vs. VST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| L.TO | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.02 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | -0.16 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.43 | -0.29 | +2.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
L.TO vs. VST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum L.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.67%, smaller than the maximum VST drawdown of -49.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L.TO and VST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| L.TO | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.67% | -49.92% | +5.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.53% | -38.21% | +23.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.53% | -49.92% | +35.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.53% | -49.92% | +35.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.06% | -20.73% | +12.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.05% | -13.87% | +6.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.22% | 20.99% | -14.77% |
Volatility
L.TO vs. VST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) is 6.47%, while Vistra Corp. (VST) has a volatility of 14.48%. This indicates that L.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| L.TO | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.47% | 14.48% | -8.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.19% | 37.12% | -20.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.21% | 49.02% | -27.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 48.35% | -29.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 42.57% | -22.18% |
Dividends
L.TO vs. VST - Dividend Comparison
L.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than VST's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L.TO Loblaw Companies Limited | 0.91% | 2.19% | 4.20% | 5.43% | 5.28% | 5.40% | 8.15% | 7.40% | 6.45% | 7.84% | 7.27% | 7.61% |
VST Vistra Corp. | 0.54% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 2.13% | 3.12% | 2.64% | 2.75% | 2.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.97% | 0.00% |
Financials
L.TO vs. VST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Loblaw Companies Limited and Vistra Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
L.TO vs. VST - Profitability Comparison
L.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a gross profit of 4.54B and revenue of 14.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.
VST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
L.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported an operating income of 1.01B and revenue of 14.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
VST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported an operating income of 1.50B and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
L.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a net income of 594.00M and revenue of 14.48B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.
VST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a net income of 980.00M and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
L.TO and VST have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for L.TO and VST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer