PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KYN vs. ICBMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KYN vs. ICBMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (KYN) and ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KYN achieves a 22.09% return, which is significantly higher than ICBMX's 20.46% return. Over the past 10 years, KYN has underperformed ICBMX with an annualized return of 7.10%, while ICBMX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.01% annualized return.


KYN

1D
-1.03%
1M
4.68%
6M
14.42%
YTD
22.09%
1Y
26.20%
3Y*
29.90%
5Y*
23.63%
10Y*
7.10%
ALL TIME*
6.14%

ICBMX

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.54%
6M
9.12%
YTD
20.46%
1Y
39.51%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
15.28%
10Y*
13.01%
ALL TIME*
7.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$4.42M$5.46M$5.51M

KYN vs. ICBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund
22.09%5.34%60.45%13.19%20.50%44.21%-51.60%11.52%-19.35%7.33%
ICBMX
ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund
20.46%15.95%21.25%11.02%0.50%30.63%5.53%22.11%-17.38%16.93%

Correlation

The correlation between KYN and ICBMX is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2004

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between KYN and ICBMX has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KYN vs. ICBMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KYN
KYN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
KYN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KYN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
KYN Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
KYN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
KYN Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ICBMX
ICBMX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ICBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ICBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KYN vs. ICBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (KYN) and ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KYNICBMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.31

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.57

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.94

12.44

-4.50

KYN vs. ICBMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KYN Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the ICBMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KYN and ICBMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KYN vs. ICBMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KYN drawdown since its inception was -91.43%, which is greater than ICBMX's maximum drawdown of -63.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KYN and ICBMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KYNICBMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.43%

-63.92%

-27.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.53%

-10.10%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.65%

-26.49%

+4.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.65%

-26.49%

+4.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.74%

-48.18%

-39.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.34%

-1.54%

-1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.77%

-17.79%

-8.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

2.90%

+0.41%

Volatility

KYN vs. ICBMX - Volatility Comparison

Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (KYN) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) at 3.51%. This indicates that KYN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KYNICBMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

3.51%

+2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.84%

12.95%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.79%

19.77%

-1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.84%

20.60%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.77%

22.23%

+18.54%

KYN vs. ICBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KYN has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than ICBMX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

KYN vs. ICBMX - Dividend Comparison

KYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, less than ICBMX's 8.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICBMX
ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund
8.31%10.01%17.24%7.07%11.07%1.32%0.32%1.55%21.58%1.19%0.53%7.78%
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund
6.91%7.75%8.34%9.45%9.05%6.42%16.17%10.34%14.17%9.97%11.24%15.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


KYN and ICBMX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KYN has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to ICBMX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KYN dropped -91.43% vs ICBMX's -63.92%.

ICBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KYN and ICBMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer