KYN vs. TYG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

KYN (Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund) and TYG (Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund) are both mutual funds - KYN is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Kayne Anderson, while TYG is a MLPs fund actively managed by Tortoise. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, KYN returned 6.40%/yr vs -1.34%/yr for TYG. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KYN charges 2.00%/yr vs 2.90%/yr for TYG.

Performance

KYN vs. TYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (KYN) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KYN achieves a 13.11% return, which is significantly higher than TYG's 11.46% return. Over the past 10 years, KYN has outperformed TYG with an annualized return of 6.40%, while TYG has yielded a comparatively lower -1.34% annualized return.

KYN

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: -4.22%
• YTD: 13.11%
• 6M: 16.98%
• 1Y: 17.77%
• 3Y*: 29.66%
• 5Y*: 19.34%
• 10Y*: 6.40%

TYG

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -6.10%
• YTD: 11.46%
• 6M: 11.03%
• 1Y: 14.27%
• 3Y*: 28.47%
• 5Y*: 18.87%
• 10Y*: -1.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KYN vs. TYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KYN Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund	13.11%	5.34%	60.45%	13.19%	20.50%	44.21%	-51.60%	11.52%	-19.35%	7.33%
TYG Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund	11.46%	8.46%	60.18%	-0.37%	24.20%	46.86%	-70.31%	1.79%	-24.74%	3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between KYN and TYG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2004	0.62

The correlation between KYN and TYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.78 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

KYN vs. TYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KYN

KYN Risk / Return Rank: 21
KYN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
KYN Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
KYN Omega Ratio Rank: 14
KYN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
KYN Martin Ratio Rank: 24

TYG

TYG Risk / Return Rank: 10
TYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
TYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
TYG Omega Ratio Rank: 10
TYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
TYG Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KYN vs. TYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (KYN) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KYN	TYG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	0.74	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	1.08	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.15	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	1.03	+1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.42	3.10	+2.32

KYN vs. TYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KYN Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the TYG Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KYN and TYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KYN vs. TYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KYN drawdown since its inception was -91.43%, roughly equal to the maximum TYG drawdown of -95.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KYN and TYG.

Drawdown Indicators

	KYN	TYG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.43%	-95.34%	+3.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.64%	-13.94%	+5.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.65%	-25.08%	+3.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.65%	-25.08%	+3.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.74%	-94.98%	+7.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.72%	-36.42%	+29.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.90%	-29.43%	+2.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.29%	4.61%	-1.32%

Volatility

KYN vs. TYG - Volatility Comparison

Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (KYN) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) at 4.08%. This indicates that KYN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KYN	TYG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.92%	4.08%	+0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.70%	17.33%	-4.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.95%	19.44%	-2.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.09%	23.85%	-0.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.86%	51.14%	-10.28%

KYN vs. TYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KYN has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TYG's 2.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

KYN vs. TYG - Dividend Comparison

KYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.34%, less than TYG's 13.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KYN Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund	7.34%	7.75%	8.34%	9.45%	9.05%	6.42%	16.17%	10.34%	14.17%	9.97%	11.24%	15.20%
TYG Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund	13.11%	11.25%	7.96%	9.87%	8.94%	5.27%	10.85%	14.61%	13.17%	9.01%	8.54%	13.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KYN and TYG in my portfolio?

KYN and TYG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KYN or TYG?

KYN has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to TYG (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KYN dropped -91.43% vs TYG's -95.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KYN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.