KYLD vs. UCO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KYLD (Kurv High Income ETF) and UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) are both exchange-traded funds - KYLD is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while UCO is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). KYLD is actively managed, while UCO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. KYLD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UCO.

Performance

KYLD vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv High Income ETF (KYLD) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KYLD achieves a 18.37% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 149.12% return.

KYLD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 10.94%
• YTD: 18.37%
• 6M: 13.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UCO

• 1D: 2.71%
• 1M: -4.64%
• YTD: 149.12%
• 6M: 137.09%
• 1Y: 120.48%
• 3Y*: 25.90%
• 5Y*: 22.16%
• 10Y*: -11.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KYLD vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KYLD Kurv High Income ETF	18.37%	-10.91%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	149.12%	-9.97%

Correlation

The correlation between KYLD and UCO is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2025	-0.25

Return for Risk

KYLD vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCO

UCO Risk / Return Rank: 54
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 50
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KYLD vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv High Income ETF (KYLD) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KYLD	UCO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	-0.34	+0.63

Drawdowns

KYLD vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KYLD drawdown since its inception was -20.69%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KYLD and UCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KYLD	UCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.69%	-99.95%	+79.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.77%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-67.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-99.23%	+99.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.57%	-85.49%	+76.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	18.33%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KYLD	UCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	20.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	46.44%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.84%	57.11%	-24.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.84%	59.78%	-26.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.84%	71.36%	-38.52%

KYLD vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KYLD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than UCO's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

KYLD vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

KYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.05%, while UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
KYLD Kurv High Income ETF	17.05%	6.14%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KYLD and UCO in my portfolio?

KYLD and UCO have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KYLD or UCO?

On fees, UCO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KYLD or UCO?

UCO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KYLD or UCO?

KYLD has the higher dividend yield at 17.05%, compared with 0.00% for UCO.

What is the main difference between KYLD and UCO?

KYLD is categorized as Derivative Income, while UCO is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KYLD and 0.95% for UCO.