KWT vs. VFH
KWT (iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF) and VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - KWT tracks the MSCI All Kuwait Select Size Liquidity Capped Index while VFH tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KWT returned 8.57%/yr vs 11.15%/yr for VFH. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KWT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFH.
Performance
KWT vs. VFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KWT achieves a -3.40% return, which is significantly lower than VFH's 3.80% return.
KWT
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- -3.40%
- 1Y
- -2.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- —
VFH
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 3.80%
- 1Y
- 9.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.45%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.24%
KWT vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KWT iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF | -3.40% | 25.38% | 11.29% | -4.71% | 5.16% | 30.73% | 7.37% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 3.80% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | 18.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between KWT and VFH is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.35 |
KWT vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KWT
VFH
Financial Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
KWT
VFH
Real Estate
KWT
VFH
Industrials
KWT
VFH
Communication Services
KWT
VFH
Consumer Defensive
KWT
VFH
-
Basic Materials
KWT
VFH
-
Consumer Cyclical
KWT
VFH
Utilities
KWT
VFH
-
Energy
KWT
-
VFH
-
Healthcare
KWT
-
VFH
Technology
KWT
-
VFH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KWT vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank
KWT
VFH
KWT vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF (KWT) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KWT | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.12 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 0.66 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 1.71 | -2.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KWT vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KWT drawdown since its inception was -24.37%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWT and VFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KWT | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.37% | -78.61% | +54.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.54% | -14.75% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.22% | -17.30% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.37% | -25.66% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.07% | -0.17% | -7.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.29% | -18.47% | +11.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.24% | 5.69% | -0.45% |
Volatility
KWT vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF (KWT) is 3.44%, while Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that KWT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KWT | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.44% | 4.12% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.27% | 11.51% | -1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.40% | 15.08% | -1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 19.21% | -5.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 22.47% | -8.55% |
KWT vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
KWT vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison
KWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than VFH's 1.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KWT iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF | 5.70% | 5.40% | 6.09% | 2.25% | 5.87% | 7.65% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.69% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KWT and VFH have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFH has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to KWT (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KWT dropped -24.37% vs VFH's -78.61%.
On 5-year performance, VFH leads with 11.15% vs 8.57% for KWT. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, KWT has been the lower-risk option at 3.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFH has performed better with a 11.15% return vs 8.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for KWT.
KWT has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 1.69% for VFH.
KWT tracks MSCI All Kuwait Select Size Liquidity Capped Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for KWT and 0.09% for VFH.
VFH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KWT and VFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer