KWIN vs. SEIV
KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) and SEIV (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. KWIN is passively managed, while SEIV is actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KWIN charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIV.
Performance
KWIN vs. SEIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KWIN achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than SEIV's 16.20% return.
KWIN
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEIV
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- 16.20%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 36.72%
- 3Y*
- 24.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KWIN vs. SEIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 1.30% | 0.61% |
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF | 16.20% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between KWIN and SEIV is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KWIN vs. SEIV — Risk / Return Rank
KWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SEIV
KWIN vs. SEIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KWIN | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.52 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 20.04 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KWIN vs. SEIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KWIN drawdown since its inception was -0.93%, smaller than the maximum SEIV drawdown of -18.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWIN and SEIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KWIN | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.93% | -18.18% | +17.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -2.60% | +2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.21% | -3.46% | +3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.84% | — |
Volatility
KWIN vs. SEIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KWIN | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.31% | 12.69% | -9.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.31% | 16.64% | -13.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.31% | 16.64% | -13.33% |
KWIN vs. SEIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWIN has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
KWIN vs. SEIV - Dividend Comparison
KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.66% | 2.08% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KWIN and SEIV have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for KWIN.
SEIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.
They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for KWIN and 0.15% for SEIV.
Find the right allocation for KWIN and SEIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer