KWIN vs. IWD
KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) and IWD (iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - KWIN tracks the Wahed Alternative Income Index while IWD tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KWIN charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IWD.
Performance
KWIN vs. IWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KWIN achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than IWD's 19.43% return.
KWIN
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWD
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- 6M
- 14.60%
- YTD
- 19.43%
- 1Y
- 30.14%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- 11.31%
KWIN vs. IWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 1.66% | 0.61% |
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 19.43% | 4.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between KWIN and IWD is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KWIN vs. IWD — Risk / Return Rank
KWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IWD
KWIN vs. IWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KWIN | IWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.55 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KWIN vs. IWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KWIN drawdown since its inception was -1.58%, smaller than the maximum IWD drawdown of -60.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWIN and IWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KWIN | IWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -60.10% | +58.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | 0.00% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.27% | -8.62% | +8.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.63% | — |
Volatility
KWIN vs. IWD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KWIN | IWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.14% | 11.28% | -7.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 14.84% | -10.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 17.24% | -13.10% |
KWIN vs. IWD - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWIN has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than IWD's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
KWIN vs. IWD - Dividend Comparison
KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 1.40% | 1.69% | 1.87% | 2.02% | 2.15% | 1.62% | 2.05% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.09% | 2.25% | 2.47% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KWIN and IWD have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWD is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWD is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for KWIN.
IWD has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.
KWIN tracks Wahed Alternative Income Index, while IWD tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for KWIN and 0.18% for IWD.
Find the right allocation for KWIN and IWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer