KWIN vs. CDC
KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) and CDC (VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - KWIN tracks the Wahed Alternative Income Index while CDC tracks the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KWIN charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for CDC.
Performance
KWIN vs. CDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KWIN achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than CDC's 18.49% return.
KWIN
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDC
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- 6M
- 13.97%
- YTD
- 18.49%
- 1Y
- 23.40%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
KWIN vs. CDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 1.66% | 0.61% |
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 18.49% | 2.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between KWIN and CDC is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KWIN vs. CDC — Risk / Return Rank
KWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CDC
KWIN vs. CDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KWIN | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KWIN vs. CDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KWIN drawdown since its inception was -1.58%, smaller than the maximum CDC drawdown of -21.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWIN and CDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KWIN | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -21.37% | +19.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | 0.00% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.27% | -5.07% | +4.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.61% | — |
Volatility
KWIN vs. CDC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KWIN | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.14% | 10.20% | -6.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 12.56% | -8.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 13.20% | -9.06% |
KWIN vs. CDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWIN has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than CDC's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
KWIN vs. CDC - Dividend Comparison
KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.03% | 3.36% | 3.32% | 4.24% | 3.48% | 2.65% | 2.48% | 3.04% | 3.37% | 2.81% | 2.99% | 3.17% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KWIN and CDC have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CDC is cheaper at 0.37% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CDC is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for KWIN.
CDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.03%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.
KWIN tracks Wahed Alternative Income Index, while CDC tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for KWIN and 0.37% for CDC.
Find the right allocation for KWIN and CDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer