KWEB vs. KSTR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) and KSTR (KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF) are both China Equities funds from KraneShares - KWEB tracks the CSI Overseas China Internet Index while KSTR tracks the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KWEB returned -15.81%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for KSTR. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KWEB charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for KSTR.

Performance

KWEB vs. KSTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KWEB achieves a -28.08% return, which is significantly lower than KSTR's 47.82% return.

KWEB

• 1D: -2.24%
• 1M: -8.99%
• YTD: -28.08%
• 6M: -29.18%
• 1Y: -22.79%
• 3Y*: 0.71%
• 5Y*: -15.81%
• 10Y*: -0.57%

KSTR

• 1D: -2.34%
• 1M: 7.54%
• YTD: 47.82%
• 6M: 47.90%
• 1Y: 108.41%
• 3Y*: 23.01%
• 5Y*: 1.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KWEB vs. KSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	-28.08%	23.55%	12.01%	-9.06%	-17.24%	-57.15%
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF	47.82%	42.82%	6.12%	-17.93%	-38.51%	-2.01%

Correlation

The correlation between KWEB and KSTR is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021	0.47

The correlation between KWEB and KSTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

KWEB vs. KSTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KWEB	KSTR
Consumer Cyclical	36.0%	0.9%
Communication Services	28.4%	-
Technology	17.5%	86.3%
Healthcare	6.0%	5.7%
Real Estate	3.9%	-
Industrials	3.3%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	-
Financial Services	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	0.6%
Energy	-	0.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KWEB vs. KSTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KWEB

KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 3
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 3
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 3

KSTR

KSTR Risk / Return Rank: 86
KSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
KSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
KSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 83
KSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
KSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KWEB vs. KSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KWEB	KSTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.84	2.93	-3.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.15	3.49	-4.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.46	-0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.58	6.16	-6.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	15.20	-16.42

KWEB vs. KSTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KWEB Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the KSTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KWEB and KSTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KWEB vs. KSTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KWEB drawdown since its inception was -80.92%, which is greater than KSTR's maximum drawdown of -66.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWEB and KSTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	KWEB	KSTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.92%	-66.46%	-14.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.49%	-17.70%	-21.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.49%	-41.55%	+2.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-72.17%	-66.46%	-5.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.68%	-2.34%	-69.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.36%	-38.47%	+3.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.70%	7.16%	+11.54%

Volatility

KWEB vs. KSTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) is 8.34%, while KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) has a volatility of 16.10%. This indicates that KWEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KWEB	KSTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.34%	16.10%	-7.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.47%	28.62%	-8.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.17%	37.27%	-10.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.70%	38.60%	+9.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.00%	37.87%	+2.13%

KWEB vs. KSTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KWEB has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than KSTR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

KWEB vs. KSTR - Dividend Comparison

KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.56%, while KSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	8.56%	6.16%	3.51%	1.71%	0.00%	7.07%	0.29%	0.08%	3.40%	0.58%	1.19%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KWEB and KSTR in my portfolio?

KWEB and KSTR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KWEB or KSTR?

KSTR has higher volatility (16.10%) compared to KWEB (8.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KWEB dropped -80.92% vs KSTR's -66.46%.

Which ETF is better, KWEB or KSTR?

On 5-year performance, KSTR leads with 1.10% vs -15.81% for KWEB. On fees, KWEB is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, KWEB has been the lower-risk option at 8.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KWEB or KSTR?

Over the 5-year period, KSTR has performed better with a 1.10% return vs -15.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KWEB or KSTR?

KWEB is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for KSTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KWEB or KSTR?

KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 8.56%, compared with 0.00% for KSTR.

What is the main difference between KWEB and KSTR?

KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index, while KSTR tracks SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for KWEB and 0.89% for KSTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KSTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.