KVUE vs. MNST
KVUE (Kenvue Inc.) and MNST (Monster Beverage Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — KVUE in Household & Personal Products, MNST in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic. Over the past 3 years, KVUE returned -7.56%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for MNST. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KVUE vs. MNST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KVUE achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than MNST's 15.39% return.
KVUE
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- 1Y
- -15.49%
- 3Y*
- -7.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNST
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- 39.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.67%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
KVUE vs. MNST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KVUE Kenvue Inc. | 4.14% | -15.86% | 3.12% | -18.44% |
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 15.39% | 45.87% | -8.77% | -0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between KVUE and MNST is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2023 | 0.31 |
Fundamentals
KVUE:
$33.73B
MNST:
$87.43B
KVUE:
$0.84
MNST:
$2.06
KVUE:
20.81
MNST:
42.93
KVUE:
2.21
MNST:
9.92
KVUE:
3.18
MNST:
10.02
KVUE:
$15.29B
MNST:
$8.79B
KVUE:
$8.93B
MNST:
$4.88B
KVUE:
$3.03B
MNST:
$2.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KVUE vs. MNST — Risk / Return Rank
KVUE
MNST
KVUE vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kenvue Inc. (KVUE) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KVUE | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.31 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 2.24 | -2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 6.37 | -7.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KVUE | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | 1.51 | -1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.33 | 0.60 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
KVUE vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KVUE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, smaller than the maximum MNST drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KVUE and MNST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KVUE | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.08% | -69.17% | +25.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.63% | -17.70% | -19.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.08% | -26.04% | -16.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.91% | -1.21% | -26.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.02% | -20.67% | -0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.33% | 6.22% | +14.11% |
Volatility
KVUE vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kenvue Inc. (KVUE) is 7.23%, while Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) has a volatility of 13.62%. This indicates that KVUE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KVUE | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 13.62% | -6.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.29% | 19.93% | -5.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.41% | 26.41% | +6.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.70% | 24.59% | +4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.70% | 26.25% | +2.45% |
Dividends
KVUE vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison
KVUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, while MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KVUE Kenvue Inc. | 4.73% | 4.78% | 3.79% | 1.86% |
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
KVUE vs. MNST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kenvue Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KVUE vs. MNST - Profitability Comparison
KVUE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenvue Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.30B and revenue of 3.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.9%.
MNST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.29B and revenue of 2.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.
KVUE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenvue Inc. reported an operating income of 767.00M and revenue of 3.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.6%.
MNST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 729.96M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.
KVUE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenvue Inc. reported a net income of 474.00M and revenue of 3.91B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
MNST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 569.49M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KVUE and MNST have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MNST has higher volatility (13.62%) compared to KVUE (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KVUE dropped -44.08% vs MNST's -69.17%.
MNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KVUE and MNST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer