PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KVLE vs. KEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KVLE vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KVLE achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 42.26% return.


KVLE

1D
-0.91%
1M
4.69%
YTD
10.22%
6M
9.55%
1Y
18.85%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*

KEMX

1D
-1.31%
1M
13.02%
YTD
42.26%
6M
47.92%
1Y
79.97%
3Y*
29.66%
5Y*
13.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KVLE vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
KVLE
KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF
10.22%9.34%18.25%10.49%-5.96%28.01%1.36%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
42.26%38.28%0.36%20.57%-19.35%10.55%8.76%

Correlation

The correlation between KVLE and KEMX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2020

0.60

The correlation between KVLE and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

KVLE vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KVLE
KEMX

Technology

27.0%
41.2%

Industrials

12.6%
8.6%

Financial Services

12.2%
20.7%

Real Estate

12.0%
1.2%

Healthcare

9.3%
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
3.0%

Energy

4.6%
4.8%

Communication Services

3.9%
3.2%

Basic Materials

1.3%
8.2%

Utilities

0.7%
2.0%

Technology

KVLE
27.0%
KEMX
41.2%

Industrials

KVLE
12.6%
KEMX
8.6%

Financial Services

KVLE
12.2%
KEMX
20.7%

Real Estate

KVLE
12.0%
KEMX
1.2%

Healthcare

KVLE
9.3%
KEMX
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

KVLE
9.2%
KEMX
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

KVLE
6.8%
KEMX
3.0%

Energy

KVLE
4.6%
KEMX
4.8%

Communication Services

KVLE
3.9%
KEMX
3.2%

Basic Materials

KVLE
1.3%
KEMX
8.2%

Utilities

KVLE
0.7%
KEMX
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KVLE vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KVLE
KVLE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
KVLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KVLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
KVLE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
KVLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
KVLE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

KEMX
KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KVLE vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KVLEKEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.62

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

5.24

-3.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.57

20.86

-13.29

KVLE vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KVLE Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KVLE and KEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KVLEKEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

3.59

-1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.75

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.68

+0.20

Drawdowns

KVLE vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KVLE drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KVLE and KEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KVLEKEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-38.80%

+20.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.59%

-15.36%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.39%

-19.62%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.38%

-30.85%

+12.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-1.31%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-8.86%

+5.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

3.85%

-1.35%

Volatility

KVLE vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) is 2.64%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that KVLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KVLEKEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

9.86%

-7.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

19.90%

-11.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

22.40%

-11.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

18.21%

-3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

20.94%

-6.61%

KVLE vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KVLE has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

KVLE vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

KVLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.30%, more than KEMX's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
2.31%3.28%3.39%2.00%4.10%4.79%1.69%2.77%
KVLE
KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF
7.30%7.90%7.99%2.53%5.78%9.51%0.35%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KVLE and KEMX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KEMX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to KVLE (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KVLE dropped -18.38% vs KEMX's -38.80%.

On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.52% vs 9.67% for KVLE. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, KVLE has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for KVLE.

KVLE has the higher dividend yield at 7.30%, compared with 2.31% for KEMX.

KVLE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while KEMX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. KVLE tracks 3D/L Value Line Dynamic Core Equity Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for KVLE and 0.25% for KEMX.

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KVLE and KEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer