KVLE vs. KEMX
KVLE (KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF) and KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KVLE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the 3D/L Value Line Dynamic Core Equity Index, while KEMX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KVLE returned 9.67%/yr vs 13.52%/yr for KEMX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KVLE charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KEMX.
Performance
KVLE vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KVLE achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 42.26% return.
KVLE
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 18.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- —
KEMX
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 13.02%
- YTD
- 42.26%
- 6M
- 47.92%
- 1Y
- 79.97%
- 3Y*
- 29.66%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- —
KVLE vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KVLE KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF | 10.22% | 9.34% | 18.25% | 10.49% | -5.96% | 28.01% | 1.36% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 42.26% | 38.28% | 0.36% | 20.57% | -19.35% | 10.55% | 8.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between KVLE and KEMX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2020 | 0.60 |
The correlation between KVLE and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
KVLE vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KVLE
KEMX
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
KVLE
KEMX
Industrials
KVLE
KEMX
Financial Services
KVLE
KEMX
Real Estate
KVLE
KEMX
Healthcare
KVLE
KEMX
Consumer Cyclical
KVLE
KEMX
Consumer Defensive
KVLE
KEMX
Energy
KVLE
KEMX
Communication Services
KVLE
KEMX
Basic Materials
KVLE
KEMX
Utilities
KVLE
KEMX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KVLE vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank
KVLE
KEMX
KVLE vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KVLE | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.62 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 5.24 | -3.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.57 | 20.86 | -13.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KVLE | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 3.59 | -1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.75 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.68 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
KVLE vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KVLE drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KVLE and KEMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KVLE | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -38.80% | +20.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -15.36% | +5.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.39% | -19.62% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.38% | -30.85% | +12.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -1.31% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -8.86% | +5.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 3.85% | -1.35% |
Volatility
KVLE vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) is 2.64%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that KVLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KVLE | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 9.86% | -7.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.35% | 19.90% | -11.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.04% | 22.40% | -11.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 18.21% | -3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 20.94% | -6.61% |
KVLE vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
KVLE has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
KVLE vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison
KVLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.30%, more than KEMX's 2.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 2.31% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.00% | 4.10% | 4.79% | 1.69% | 2.77% |
KVLE KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF | 7.30% | 7.90% | 7.99% | 2.53% | 5.78% | 9.51% | 0.35% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KVLE and KEMX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEMX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to KVLE (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KVLE dropped -18.38% vs KEMX's -38.80%.
On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.52% vs 9.67% for KVLE. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, KVLE has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for KVLE.
KVLE has the higher dividend yield at 7.30%, compared with 2.31% for KEMX.
KVLE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while KEMX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. KVLE tracks 3D/L Value Line Dynamic Core Equity Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for KVLE and 0.25% for KEMX.
KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KVLE and KEMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer