PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KULR vs. SPOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KULR vs. SPOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KULR achieves a -6.76% return, which is significantly higher than SPOT's -15.22% return.


KULR

1D
4.94%
1M
-30.30%
6M
-33.97%
YTD
-6.76%
1Y
-60.00%
3Y*
-29.83%
5Y*
-30.52%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-13.48%

SPOT

1D
2.97%
1M
5.18%
6M
-2.41%
YTD
-15.22%
1Y
-29.21%
3Y*
42.06%
5Y*
14.71%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KULR vs. SPOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KULR
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
-6.76%-89.58%1,818.92%-84.58%-56.52%87.76%-2.00%-42.31%136.36%
SPOT
Spotify Technology S.A.
-15.22%29.80%138.08%138.01%-66.27%-25.62%110.40%31.76%-39.32%

Correlation

The correlation between KULR and SPOT is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KULR:

$127.67M

SPOT:

$101.23B

EPS

KULR:

-$1.53

SPOT:

€12.84

PS Ratio

KULR:

6.90

SPOT:

5.18

PB Ratio

KULR:

0.90

SPOT:

11.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

KULR:

$16.17M

SPOT:

€17.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KULR:

$770.97K

SPOT:

€5.68B

EBITDA (TTM)

KULR:

-$60.59M

SPOT:

€2.75B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KULR vs. SPOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KULR
KULR Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
KULR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KULR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
KULR Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
KULR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KULR Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SPOT
SPOT Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SPOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KULR vs. SPOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KULRSPOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.90

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.85

-0.66

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

-1.10

-0.12

KULR vs. SPOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KULR Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is comparable to the SPOT Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KULR and SPOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KULR vs. SPOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KULR drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, which is greater than SPOT's maximum drawdown of -80.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KULR and SPOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KULRSPOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.23%

-80.51%

-16.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.06%

-44.11%

-26.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.74%

-46.80%

-47.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.86%

-76.39%

-20.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.81%

-36.55%

-56.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.54%

-30.96%

-35.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.07%

26.55%

+22.52%

Volatility

KULR vs. SPOT - Volatility Comparison

KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a higher volatility of 27.42% compared to Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) at 8.93%. This indicates that KULR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KULRSPOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.42%

8.93%

+18.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.15%

37.30%

+37.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.43%

44.99%

+53.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

126.48%

47.60%

+78.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

126.74%

47.21%

+79.53%

Dividends

KULR vs. SPOT - Dividend Comparison

Neither KULR nor SPOT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

KULR vs. SPOT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KULR Technology Group, Inc. and Spotify Technology S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.86M
4.61B
(KULR) Total Revenue
(SPOT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. KULR values in USD, SPOT values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


KULR and SPOT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KULR has higher volatility (27.42%) compared to SPOT (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KULR dropped -97.23% vs SPOT's -80.51%.

KULR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.61 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KULR and SPOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer