KULR vs. RDW
KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) and RDW (Redwire Corporation) are both stocks. KULR operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while RDW operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, KULR returned -12.23%/yr vs 79.83%/yr for RDW. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KULR vs. RDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KULR achieves a 28.04% return, which is significantly lower than RDW's 98.95% return.
KULR
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- 28.04%
- 6M
- -0.26%
- 1Y
- -61.48%
- 3Y*
- -12.23%
- 5Y*
- -28.07%
- 10Y*
- —
RDW
- 1D
- -11.53%
- 1M
- 31.94%
- YTD
- 98.95%
- 6M
- 107.41%
- 1Y
- -21.74%
- 3Y*
- 79.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KULR vs. RDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 28.04% | -89.58% | 1,818.92% | -84.58% | -56.52% | 28.37% |
RDW Redwire Corporation | 98.95% | -53.83% | 477.54% | 43.94% | -70.67% | -34.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between KULR and RDW is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2021 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, KULR and RDW have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
KULR:
$150.57M
RDW:
$2.93B
KULR:
-$1.57
RDW:
-$2.16
KULR:
9.25
RDW:
5.66
KULR:
1.24
RDW:
2.90
KULR:
$16.17M
RDW:
$370.96M
KULR:
$770.97K
RDW:
$34.05M
KULR:
-$60.59M
RDW:
-$221.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KULR vs. RDW — Risk / Return Rank
KULR
RDW
KULR vs. RDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Redwire Corporation (RDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KULR | RDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.07 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | -0.29 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | -0.42 | -0.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KULR vs. RDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KULR drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, which is greater than RDW's maximum drawdown of -87.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KULR and RDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KULR | RDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.23% | -87.26% | -9.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.04% | -75.40% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.74% | -80.28% | -14.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.13% | -41.62% | -48.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.25% | -59.30% | -6.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.77% | 51.88% | +8.89% |
Volatility
KULR vs. RDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) is 38.71%, while Redwire Corporation (RDW) has a volatility of 53.68%. This indicates that KULR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KULR | RDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.71% | 53.68% | -14.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.01% | 94.49% | -17.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.97% | 118.63% | -12.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.04% | 96.83% | +29.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 127.06% | 96.83% | +30.23% |
Dividends
KULR vs. RDW - Dividend Comparison
Neither KULR nor RDW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
KULR vs. RDW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KULR Technology Group, Inc. and Redwire Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
KULR and RDW have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDW has higher volatility (53.68%) compared to KULR (38.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KULR dropped -97.23% vs RDW's -87.26%.
RDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.18 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KULR and RDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer