NAK vs. LIT
Compare and contrast key facts about Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT).
LIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010.
Performance
NAK vs. LIT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NAK vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAK Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. | -28.93% | 238.78% | 79.86% | 46.42% | -32.31% | 1.30% | -25.12% | -24.46% | -67.84% | -14.49% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 14.63% | 60.05% | -19.19% | -12.18% | -29.91% | 36.74% | 127.88% | 3.27% | -28.63% | 64.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAK achieves a -28.93% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's 14.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NAK having a 15.05% annualized return and LIT not far behind at 14.87%.
NAK
- 1D
- 10.24%
- 1M
- -9.68%
- YTD
- -28.93%
- 6M
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- 21.74%
- 3Y*
- 80.31%
- 5Y*
- 16.53%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
LIT
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- 14.63%
- 6M
- 31.14%
- 1Y
- 92.83%
- 3Y*
- 6.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NAK vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank
NAK
LIT
NAK vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NAK | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.18 | 2.70 | -2.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 3.28 | -2.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.44 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 5.00 | -4.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.66 | 19.45 | -18.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NAK | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | 2.70 | -2.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.17 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.49 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.24 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between NAK and LIT is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NAK vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison
NAK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAK Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 0.42% | 0.49% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% |
Drawdowns
NAK vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAK drawdown since its inception was -99.01%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAK and LIT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAK | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.01% | -65.91% | -33.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.68% | -17.61% | -50.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.85% | -65.91% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.79% | -65.91% | -27.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.36% | -19.86% | -73.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.78% | -33.90% | -39.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.08% | 4.63% | +33.45% |
Volatility
NAK vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) has a higher volatility of 25.14% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 11.99%. This indicates that NAK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NAK | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.14% | 11.99% | +13.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 85.88% | 24.73% | +61.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.51% | 34.57% | +84.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.25% | 31.68% | +51.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 98.15% | 30.50% | +67.65% |