KULR vs. LUNR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) and LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) are both stocks. KULR operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while LUNR operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, KULR returned -12.23%/yr vs 42.24%/yr for LUNR. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KULR vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KULR achieves a 28.04% return, which is significantly lower than LUNR's 64.02% return.

KULR

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: -6.42%
• YTD: 28.04%
• 6M: -0.26%
• 1Y: -61.48%
• 3Y*: -12.23%
• 5Y*: -28.07%
• 10Y*: —

LUNR

• 1D: -13.12%
• 1M: -25.39%
• YTD: 64.02%
• 6M: 122.39%
• 1Y: 144.44%
• 3Y*: 42.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KULR vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc.	28.04%	-89.58%	1,818.92%	-84.58%	-56.52%	-24.38%
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc.	64.02%	-10.63%	610.76%	-74.45%	3.73%	-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between KULR and LUNR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021	0.29

Over the past year, KULR and LUNR have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap KULR : $150.57M LUNR : $3.94T
EPS KULR : -$1.57 LUNR : -$0.00
PS Ratio KULR : 9.25 LUNR : 2.95K
Total Revenue (TTM) KULR : $16.17M LUNR : $334.27M
Gross Profit (TTM) KULR : $770.97K LUNR : $85.92M
EBITDA (TTM) KULR : -$60.59M LUNR : -$96.76M

Return for Risk

KULR vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KULR

KULR Risk / Return Rank: 18
KULR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
KULR Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
KULR Omega Ratio Rank: 21
KULR Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
KULR Martin Ratio Rank: 21

LUNR

LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 81
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KULR vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KULR	LUNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.58	1.31	-1.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.56	2.24	-2.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.26	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	3.47	-4.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.06	7.12	-8.18

KULR vs. LUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KULR Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the LUNR Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KULR and LUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KULR vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KULR drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, roughly equal to the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KULR and LUNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	KULR	LUNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.23%	-97.43%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.04%	-41.94%	-36.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-94.74%	-78.54%	-16.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-90.13%	-67.53%	-22.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.25%	-63.21%	-3.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	60.77%	20.37%	+40.40%

Volatility

KULR vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) is 38.71%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 42.95%. This indicates that KULR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KULR	LUNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	38.71%	42.95%	-4.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	77.01%	93.42%	-16.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	105.97%	111.16%	-5.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	126.04%	171.29%	-45.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	127.06%	171.29%	-44.23%

Dividends

KULR vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison

Neither KULR nor LUNR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KULR and LUNR in my portfolio?

KULR and LUNR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KULR or LUNR?

LUNR has higher volatility (42.95%) compared to KULR (38.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KULR dropped -97.23% vs LUNR's -97.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.