PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KULR vs. INTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KULR vs. INTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Intel Corporation (INTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KULR achieves a 26.01% return, which is significantly lower than INTC's 198.83% return.


KULR

1D
-2.10%
1M
29.07%
YTD
26.01%
6M
-3.62%
1Y
-60.49%
3Y*
-11.82%
5Y*
-29.09%
10Y*

INTC

1D
11.19%
1M
-11.73%
YTD
198.83%
6M
173.62%
1Y
449.70%
3Y*
53.12%
5Y*
16.15%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KULR vs. INTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KULR
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
26.01%-89.58%1,818.92%-84.58%-56.52%87.76%-2.00%-42.31%73.33%
INTC
Intel Corporation
198.83%84.04%-59.57%94.56%-46.64%6.05%-14.69%30.71%-8.14%

Correlation

The correlation between KULR and INTC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018

0.14

The correlation between KULR and INTC shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KULR:

$148.18M

INTC:

$560.50B

EPS

KULR:

-$1.57

INTC:

-$0.67

PS Ratio

KULR:

9.11

INTC:

9.66

PB Ratio

KULR:

1.22

INTC:

5.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

KULR:

$16.17M

INTC:

$53.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KULR:

$770.97K

INTC:

$19.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

KULR:

-$60.59M

INTC:

$8.83B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KULR vs. INTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KULR
KULR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
KULR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KULR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
KULR Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
KULR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
KULR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

INTC
INTC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
INTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTC Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
INTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTC Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KULR vs. INTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Intel Corporation (INTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KULRINTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.64

-0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

18.76

-19.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.99

44.28

-45.28

KULR vs. INTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KULR Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the INTC Sharpe Ratio of 6.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KULR and INTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KULRINTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

6.16

-6.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

0.31

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.36

-0.47

Drawdowns

KULR vs. INTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KULR drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, which is greater than INTC's maximum drawdown of -82.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KULR and INTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KULRINTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.23%

-82.25%

-14.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.80%

-24.17%

-55.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.74%

-63.80%

-30.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.86%

-65.95%

-30.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.29%

-14.81%

-75.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.23%

-36.67%

-29.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

60.84%

10.22%

+50.62%

Volatility

KULR vs. INTC - Volatility Comparison

KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a higher volatility of 47.09% compared to Intel Corporation (INTC) at 26.82%. This indicates that KULR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KULRINTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

47.09%

26.82%

+20.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

76.46%

57.68%

+18.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

106.05%

73.75%

+32.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

126.05%

52.06%

+73.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

126.51%

44.07%

+82.44%

Dividends

KULR vs. INTC - Dividend Comparison

Neither KULR nor INTC has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INTC
Intel Corporation
0.00%0.00%1.87%1.47%5.52%2.70%2.65%2.11%2.56%2.33%2.87%2.79%
KULR
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

KULR vs. INTC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KULR Technology Group, Inc. and Intel Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
2.86M
13.58B
(KULR) Total Revenue
(INTC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


KULR and INTC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KULR has higher volatility (47.09%) compared to INTC (26.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KULR dropped -97.23% vs INTC's -82.25%.

INTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.16 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KULR and INTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer