KTEC vs. ASHS
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS).
KTEC and ASHS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KTEC is a passively managed fund by KraneShares that tracks the performance of the Hang Seng Tech Index. It was launched on Jun 8, 2021. ASHS is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the CSI 500 Index. It was launched on May 21, 2014. Both KTEC and ASHS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
KTEC vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KTEC vs. ASHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | -12.39% | 21.01% | 16.13% | -10.41% | -26.12% | -29.50% |
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 4.66% | 39.48% | 2.68% | -10.03% | -24.78% | 9.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KTEC achieves a -12.39% return, which is significantly lower than ASHS's 4.66% return.
KTEC
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- -12.39%
- 6M
- -25.44%
- 1Y
- -12.67%
- 3Y*
- 2.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASHS
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -11.46%
- YTD
- 4.66%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 40.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KTEC vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
KTEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHS's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KTEC vs. ASHS — Risk / Return Rank
KTEC
ASHS
KTEC vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KTEC | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | 1.70 | -2.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | 2.16 | -2.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.32 | -0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 2.85 | -3.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 10.16 | -11.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KTEC | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 | 1.70 | -2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.17 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between KTEC and ASHS is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
KTEC vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison
KTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, while ASHS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | 3.83% | 3.36% | 0.27% | 0.81% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.65% | 1.90% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.34% |
Drawdowns
KTEC vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KTEC drawdown since its inception was -66.90%, roughly equal to the maximum ASHS drawdown of -69.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTEC and ASHS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KTEC | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.90% | -69.90% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.36% | -14.03% | -15.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.71% | -39.59% | -5.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.97% | -48.78% | +4.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.39% | 3.93% | +8.46% |
Volatility
KTEC vs. ASHS - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) at 8.57%. This indicates that KTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KTEC | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.77% | 8.57% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.86% | 16.21% | +3.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.06% | 24.04% | +7.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.59% | 26.08% | +17.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.59% | 25.64% | +17.95% |