PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRW=X vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KRW=X vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a ₩10,000 investment in US Dollar/Korean Won FX (KRW=X) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

KRW=X is traded in KRW, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to KRW using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRW=X achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.33% return. Over the past 10 years, KRW=X has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 2.64%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.18% annualized return.


KRW=X

1D
1.55%
1M
-6.17%
6M
-0.52%
YTD
0.16%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
2.64%
ALL TIME*
2.30%

VOO

1D
2.27%
1M
-5.93%
6M
8.02%
YTD
10.33%
1Y
26.31%
3Y*
24.08%
5Y*
18.01%
10Y*
18.18%
ALL TIME*
16.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
₩104.31M₩112.88M₩95.47M
₩5.57T₩5.60T₩8.20T

KRW=X vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KRW=X
US Dollar/Korean Won FX
0.16%-2.30%14.01%2.85%5.66%9.56%-5.87%3.80%4.32%-11.65%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.33%15.12%42.49%29.92%-13.54%41.10%11.38%36.35%-0.38%7.59%

Correlation

The correlation between KRW=X and VOO is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.23

The correlation between KRW=X and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (10 years) to 0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRW=X vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KRW=X
KRW=X Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
KRW=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRW=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRW=X Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
KRW=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRW=X Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KRW=X vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Dollar/Korean Won FX (KRW=X) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KRW=XVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.32

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

2.68

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.39

10.21

-8.82

KRW=X vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRW=X Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRW=X and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KRW=X vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRW=X drawdown since its inception was -35.73%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -30.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRW=X and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRW=XVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.73%

-30.73%

-5.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-8.94%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.86%

-17.09%

+8.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

-17.39%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.41%

-30.73%

+15.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.11%

-6.86%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.03%

-3.23%

-18.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

2.35%

-0.04%

Volatility

KRW=X vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Dollar/Korean Won FX (KRW=X) is 3.14%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that KRW=X experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRW=XVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

4.61%

-1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

9.89%

-2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.15%

12.88%

-3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.18%

16.26%

-7.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.51%

16.75%

-8.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


KRW=X and VOO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to KRW=X (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRW=X dropped -35.73% vs VOO's -30.73%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRW=X and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer