PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRW=X vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KRW=X vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a ₩10,000 investment in US Dollar/Korean Won FX (KRW=X) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

KRW=X is traded in KRW, while GLDM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLDM values have been converted to KRW using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRW=X achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -5.98% return.


KRW=X

1D
1.55%
1M
-6.17%
6M
-0.52%
YTD
0.16%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
2.64%
ALL TIME*
2.30%

GLDM

1D
0.06%
1M
-7.78%
6M
-16.96%
YTD
-5.98%
1Y
25.28%
3Y*
32.57%
5Y*
22.69%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
₩384.00B₩371.95B₩478.15B
₩104.31M₩112.88M₩95.47M

KRW=X vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KRW=X
US Dollar/Korean Won FX
0.16%-2.30%14.01%2.85%5.66%9.56%-5.87%3.80%-0.28%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
-5.98%60.43%44.89%16.26%5.16%5.16%17.75%22.58%1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between KRW=X and GLDM is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018

0.23

The correlation between KRW=X and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRW=X vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KRW=X
KRW=X Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
KRW=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRW=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRW=X Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
KRW=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRW=X Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KRW=X vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Dollar/Korean Won FX (KRW=X) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KRW=XGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.20

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

1.12

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.39

2.74

-1.35

KRW=X vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRW=X Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRW=X and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KRW=X vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRW=X drawdown since its inception was -35.73%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -24.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRW=X and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRW=XGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.73%

-24.69%

-11.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-24.69%

+15.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.86%

-24.69%

+15.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

-24.69%

+9.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.11%

-24.65%

+16.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.03%

-6.08%

-15.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

10.04%

-7.73%

Volatility

KRW=X vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Dollar/Korean Won FX (KRW=X) is 3.14%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that KRW=X experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRW=XGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

6.82%

-3.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

21.73%

-13.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.15%

26.93%

-17.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.18%

17.62%

-8.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.51%

16.73%

-8.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


KRW=X and GLDM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDM has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to KRW=X (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRW=X dropped -35.73% vs GLDM's -24.69%.

GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRW=X and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer