PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRT vs. COP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KRT vs. COP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRT achieves a 37.80% return, which is significantly higher than COP's 26.87% return.


KRT

1D
0.77%
1M
16.45%
YTD
37.80%
6M
35.05%
1Y
22.32%
3Y*
27.62%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*

COP

1D
1.40%
1M
-4.44%
YTD
26.87%
6M
24.31%
1Y
24.65%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
18.49%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRT vs. COP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KRT
Karat Packaging Inc.
37.80%-20.12%28.81%86.11%-27.07%8.66%
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
26.87%-2.34%-12.02%1.98%71.69%40.34%

Correlation

The correlation between KRT and COP is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021

0.11

The correlation between KRT and COP shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KRT:

$603.41M

COP:

$143.30B

EPS

KRT:

$1.58

COP:

$5.90

PE Ratio

KRT:

19.04

COP:

19.83

PEG Ratio

KRT:

1.95

COP:

1.15

PS Ratio

KRT:

1.26

COP:

2.49

PB Ratio

KRT:

3.89

COP:

2.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

KRT:

$481.07M

COP:

$58.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KRT:

$172.90M

COP:

$17.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

KRT:

$56.33M

COP:

$22.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRT vs. COP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRT
KRT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
KRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
KRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

COP
COP Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
COP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
COP Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
COP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
COP Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRT vs. COP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KRTCOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.17

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

1.86

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.66

4.08

-2.42

KRT vs. COP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the COP Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRT and COP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KRT vs. COP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRT drawdown since its inception was -48.46%, smaller than the maximum COP drawdown of -84.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRT and COP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRTCOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.46%

-84.55%

+36.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.80%

-14.90%

-11.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.03%

-36.19%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.46%

-36.19%

-12.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-11.92%

+11.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.50%

-25.49%

+6.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.84%

6.80%

+6.04%

Volatility

KRT vs. COP - Volatility Comparison

Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) has a higher volatility of 9.84% compared to ConocoPhillips Company (COP) at 8.72%. This indicates that KRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRTCOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.84%

8.72%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.08%

23.05%

+5.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.86%

29.33%

+7.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.39%

32.80%

+12.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.43%

37.64%

+7.79%

Dividends

KRT vs. COP - Dividend Comparison

KRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than COP's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
2.82%3.40%3.35%3.37%4.23%2.70%4.23%2.05%1.86%1.93%1.99%6.30%
KRT
Karat Packaging Inc.
5.99%7.98%5.12%6.24%2.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

KRT vs. COP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Karat Packaging Inc. and ConocoPhillips Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
116.95M
16.05B
(KRT) Total Revenue
(COP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KRT vs. COP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Karat Packaging Inc. and ConocoPhillips Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%20222023202420252026
35.5%
46.7%
Portfolio components
KRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Karat Packaging Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.53M and revenue of 116.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.

COP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 7.50B and revenue of 16.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.7%.

KRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Karat Packaging Inc. reported an operating income of 8.46M and revenue of 116.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.

COP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 3.36B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.

KRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Karat Packaging Inc. reported a net income of 6.74M and revenue of 116.95M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

COP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KRT and COP have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KRT has higher volatility (9.84%) compared to COP (8.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRT dropped -48.46% vs COP's -84.55%.

COP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRT and COP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer