KROP vs. PHO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) and PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KROP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index, while PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KROP returned -1.65%/yr vs 7.13%/yr for PHO. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KROP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PHO.

Performance

KROP vs. PHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KROP achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than PHO's -4.97% return.

KROP

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: -4.97%
• YTD: 13.17%
• 6M: 11.49%
• 1Y: 8.94%
• 3Y*: -1.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PHO

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 2.30%
• YTD: -4.97%
• 6M: -6.44%
• 1Y: -1.80%
• 3Y*: 7.13%
• 5Y*: 5.17%
• 10Y*: 11.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KROP vs. PHO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	13.17%	7.95%	-8.74%	-23.86%	-27.23%	-19.99%
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF	-4.97%	7.62%	8.59%	18.85%	-14.86%	11.65%

Correlation

The correlation between KROP and PHO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021	0.55

The correlation between KROP and PHO shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KROP vs. PHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KROP	PHO
Industrials	38.9%	56.3%
Basic Materials	30.8%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	24.2%	-
Healthcare	4.3%	8.2%
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	13.1%
Utilities	-	14.1%

Return for Risk

KROP vs. PHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 19
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 19
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 19

PHO

PHO Risk / Return Rank: 7
PHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
PHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PHO Omega Ratio Rank: 7
PHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
PHO Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KROP vs. PHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KROP	PHO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.55	-0.21	+0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	-0.20	+1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	0.98	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	-0.23	+1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.76	-0.58	+2.34

KROP vs. PHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KROP Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the PHO Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KROP and PHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KROP vs. PHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KROP drawdown since its inception was -62.08%, which is greater than PHO's maximum drawdown of -55.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROP and PHO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KROP	PHO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.08%	-55.62%	-6.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.29%	-13.78%	+2.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.70%	-19.19%	-9.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.60%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.58%	-10.21%	-40.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.68%	-10.18%	-34.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.13%	5.59%	-0.46%

Volatility

KROP vs. PHO - Volatility Comparison

Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) at 4.41%. This indicates that KROP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KROP	PHO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.14%	4.41%	+0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.47%	11.15%	+1.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.37%	15.12%	+1.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.28%	18.40%	+3.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.28%	19.46%	+2.82%

KROP vs. PHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KROP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PHO's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

KROP vs. PHO - Dividend Comparison

KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than PHO's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.41%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF	0.58%	0.54%	0.45%	0.59%	0.49%	0.20%	0.39%	0.43%	0.46%	0.34%	0.47%	0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KROP and PHO in my portfolio?

KROP and PHO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KROP or PHO?

KROP has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to PHO (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KROP dropped -62.08% vs PHO's -55.62%.

Which ETF is better, KROP or PHO?

On 3-year performance, PHO leads with 7.13% vs -1.65% for KROP. On fees, KROP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PHO has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KROP or PHO?

Over the 3-year period, PHO has performed better with a 7.13% return vs -1.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KROP or PHO?

KROP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PHO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KROP or PHO?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.58% for PHO.

What is the main difference between KROP and PHO?

KROP is categorized as Technology Equities, while PHO is Water Equities. KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index, while PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KROP and 0.60% for PHO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KROP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.