KROP vs. BATT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) and BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KROP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index, while BATT is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Amplify. KROP is passively managed, while BATT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, KROP returned -1.65%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for BATT. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KROP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BATT.

Performance

KROP vs. BATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KROP achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly lower than BATT's 19.49% return.

KROP

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: -4.97%
• YTD: 13.17%
• 6M: 11.49%
• 1Y: 8.94%
• 3Y*: -1.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BATT

• 1D: 3.19%
• 1M: -6.31%
• YTD: 19.49%
• 6M: 21.87%
• 1Y: 88.06%
• 3Y*: 10.63%
• 5Y*: 1.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KROP vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	13.17%	7.95%	-8.74%	-23.86%	-27.23%	-19.99%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	19.49%	59.70%	-13.93%	-7.05%	-32.25%	1.55%

Correlation

The correlation between KROP and BATT is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021	0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between KROP and BATT has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KROP vs. BATT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KROP	BATT
Industrials	38.9%	16.9%
Basic Materials	30.8%	57.0%
Consumer Defensive	24.2%	-
Healthcare	4.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	18.9%
Communication Services	-	0.0%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	5.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KROP vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 19
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 19
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 19

BATT

BATT Risk / Return Rank: 86
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 80
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KROP vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KROP	BATT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.55	2.65	-2.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	3.04	-2.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.41	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	5.03	-4.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.76	16.97	-15.21

KROP vs. BATT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KROP Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the BATT Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KROP and BATT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KROP vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KROP drawdown since its inception was -62.08%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROP and BATT.

Drawdown Indicators

	KROP	BATT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.08%	-69.38%	+7.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.29%	-17.03%	+5.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.70%	-47.65%	+18.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.58%	-8.54%	-42.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.68%	-34.68%	-10.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.13%	5.04%	+0.09%

Volatility

KROP vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) is 5.14%, while Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a volatility of 13.45%. This indicates that KROP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KROP	BATT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.14%	13.45%	-8.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.47%	26.58%	-14.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.37%	32.35%	-15.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.28%	29.87%	-7.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.28%	30.74%	-8.46%

KROP vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KROP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BATT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

KROP vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison

KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than BATT's 1.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	1.55%	1.85%	3.17%	3.23%	4.14%	2.32%	0.21%	3.22%	0.89%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.41%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KROP and BATT in my portfolio?

KROP and BATT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KROP or BATT?

BATT has higher volatility (13.45%) compared to KROP (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KROP dropped -62.08% vs BATT's -69.38%.

Which ETF is better, KROP or BATT?

On 3-year performance, BATT leads with 10.63% vs -1.65% for KROP. On fees, KROP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KROP or BATT?

Over the 3-year period, BATT has performed better with a 10.63% return vs -1.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KROP or BATT?

KROP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BATT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KROP or BATT?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.55% for BATT.

What is the main difference between KROP and BATT?

KROP is categorized as Technology Equities, while BATT is Commodity Producers Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KROP and 0.59% for BATT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.